First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
The latest version of the open-source office suite OpenOffice.org 3.1 has just arrived, and it's a good one.
- Free, can match Microsoft Office in many areas
- Impress is not as good as PowerPoint
We've been using OpenOffice for years now. With these performance and appearance improvements, we can see more users moving to this free office suite. In particular, we think anyone who does spreadsheets every day owes it to themselves to compare Calc and Excel. You'll be impressed.
OpenOffice 3.1: What's cool about it?
OpenOffice 3.1, like the Mozilla Firefox web browser, can use extensions to increase its functionality. For example, Writer's existing grammar checker framework can now be augmented with extensions like LanguageTool.
It won't significantly improve your writing, but it will save you from some of the more idiotic grammar errors. We've been waiting for this feature since OpenOffice.org first showed up. (Although we did encounter some Java run-time errors when we tried to run it.)
In Calc, OpenOffice 3.1's answer to Excel, performance has been given an incredible boost. (Complicated spreadsheets that in the past allowed me to take a five-minute coffee break while they finished their calculations now run in five seconds.) In the past, we kept a copy of Excel around for taking care of heavy-duty spreadsheet jobs. We won't need to do that anymore.
OpenOffice 3.1: What needs to be fixed?
It's not all good news. Much as we dislike sitting through PowerPoint presentations, we know that many people rely on PowerPoint every day to get their points across. Impress, OpenOffice 3.1's presentation manager, is good, but it's not PowerPoint good.
There are some improvements, thanks in large part to anti-aliasing making the graphics sharper, but it simply doesn't offer as many features. If you just do presentations once in a blue moon, Impress is fine. If you make your living with PowerPoint, you won't be impressed with Impress.
Latest News Articles
- Yahoo acquires video streaming startup RayV
- New Relic's analysis service goes live
- Hardware hackathon hopes for new ideas on 3D printers, robots
- Wall Street Beat: Tech sales news mixed ahead of earnings
- Microsoft acquires InMage to boost Azure Site Recovery
Most Popular Articles
- 1 What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- 2 Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- 3 Windows 7 Home Premium vs. Windows 7 Professional
- 4 How to play DVD movies on your Nintendo Wii
- 5 How do I connect my TV to the Internet?
GGG Evaluation Team
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.