- compact, can produce sharp images, HD movies
- flash is ordinary, hit and miss photo quality
- • • •
I noticed a lot of users giving this camera ten out of ten on test freaks and I am still trying to work out why. A decent point and shoot it is, perfect it is far from. Indoor shots can be dark unless you are close to your subject, and action shots are blurry a lot of the time. The intelligent auto function can be far from intelligent at times. My 5 year old, 7.1 MP Kodak produces shots of comparable quality. The movie mode is ok and the camera is compact and neat, but I can't help feeling that i may have been better off not owning this one.
Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FH2 compact camera
Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FH2 review: A compact camera that's decent value for money, but don't expect great image quality
- Comfortable to use
- Shoots HD video
- Includes fun art modes
- Noticeable purple fringing in some shots
- Struggles to find proper exposure on bright days
- Can't handle highlights
The Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FH2 won't dazzle you with its image quality, but for $199 it's a decent compact that's comfortable to use and it also offers HD video recording. It's useful for taking happy snaps with the intention of sharing them via social networking sites.
Price$ 199.00 (AUD)
The Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FH2 is a compact camera that's simple to operate and it has a decent set of features for its sub-$200 price. You get a 14-megapixel sensor, a 28mm wide angle lens with a 4x zoom, and built-in image stabilisation. However, its picture quality isn't great and it often struggled to properly expose pictures on sunny days during our tests.
The Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FH2 is very similar to the DMC-FH5, with the only difference being a slightly smaller sensor resolution: 14 megapixels for the FH2 as opposed to 16 megapixels for the FH5. The optics and the processing ability of the FH2 are the same as the FH5 and this means that the performance of both cameras is very similar, but you're paying $50 less for the FH2.
In many ways the LUMIX DMC-FH2 is a good value camera — an extra two megapixels doesn't make too much of a difference, but it does help if you want to crop your photos closely. That said, if you crop the photos from the FH2 too much, they will noticeably lose their definition and just look muddy. If all you want to do is capture happy snaps that will then be uploaded to social networking sites, then the FH2 is a camera that's well worth considering. It doesn't come with any manual modes, so it's very simple to operate: plonk it in normal or iAuto mode, look at the 2.7in LCD screen to frame your photos and press the shutter button.
The lens on the Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FH2 has a wide aperture value of f/3.1 and the camera will automatically select this in dark conditions when it needs as much light as possible. In our tests, the FH2 was decent in dim lighting conditions and it allowed us to take handheld photos that were reasonably clear even with a reported shutter speed of 1/8sec. The built-in image stabilisation helped in this instance, and the camera also selected a higher ISO speed in this instance.
You won't want the camera to use too high an ISO speed as the picture quality will deteriorate once it goes over ISO 400, and unfortunately, it doesn't have an ISO limiting function like many other LUMIX cameras, which means you can't tell it to only use up to a certain value.
Sunny days can be hard to deal with for the LUMIX DMC-FH2. Highlights were blown out in many of our photos, and in photos with both large dark and bright areas, the camera's metering struggled perform properly. In some shots, shaded areas looked good while sun-drenched areas turned white. We found that we had to aim directly at the brightest part of the photo and then reframe our original shot in order to make the camera perform properly, but even then, it just refused to properly expose some bright areas. We noticed that we had less chance of getting a properly exposed photo with normal mode than we did with iAuto mode.
Another blemish on the LUMIX DMC-FH2's image quality is that it produced noticeable purple fringing in many photos. This was particularly prominent in trees against a bright blue sky in the middle of the day. It's something that you'll have to look out for as it can ruin otherwise good looking images.
When conditions aren't too bright, then the Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FH2 is a handy camera to have around. It doesn't feel sluggish in its shot-to-shot performance (not for a sub-$200 compact anyway) and it's very comfortable to hold and use — unlike the similarly-priced Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W530. There is plenty of thumb room and the shutter button has a distinct two-step feel for focusing before ultimately taking a photo. It has the same 28 scene modes as the FH5, and this includes the Film Grain, Pin Hole and High Dynamic art modes. You also get face recognition focusing and focus tracking, both of which are useful, and it can shoot video at a resolution of 1280x720.
Overall, we found the Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FH2's image quality to be slightly lower than the DMC-FH5's, especially in the way it handles bright scenes. Nevertheless, it's still a decent camera to consider if your budget is $200 and you only want to capture happy snaps and shoot the odd video. Become a fan of PC World Australia on Facebook
Follow PC World Australia on Twitter: @PCWorldAu
Stay up to date with the latest news, reviews and features. Sign up to PC World’s newsletters
- leica lens
- • • •
i have hardly used this cam for 3-4 times from the date of purchase the lens has been stuck and not working. really a bad performance. i gave it to a service center and they said it is gonna take 50 days to fix since they don't have the parts available.i recommend never buy this product.poor performance and poor quality.
- lumix gf2 n dmc-fh2
- outer charging
- • • •
so far so good..i got the best shot n clear picture by using the variety scene modes
Latest News Articles
- NTT launches browser-to-browser chatroom with avatars
- Fire at Samsung facility affects website, media portal
- Activists want net neutrality, NSA spying debated at Brazil Internet conference
- Google invites Glass wearers to brave LA's beaches
- Telerik frees HTML5 collection of components
Most Popular Articles
- 1 Top 5 reasons to hate the Samsung Galaxy S5
- 2 What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- 3 Windows 7 Home Premium vs. Windows 7 Professional
- 4 Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- 5 Five flaws in Samsung Galaxy S5's TouchWiz
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.