I searched too many cameras in market to get a balanced zoom and better picture quality and finally purchased it from a shop. About the camera it is simply amazing. Good features for the money and also very light weight.........HD is purely impressive with 16X zoom is giving a unblurred image. Overall happy with the purchase.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 camera
The Lumix DMC-SZ1 is a decent, but uninspiring compact camera from Panasonic
Panasonic's Lumix DMC-SZ1 is a small and automatic camera with a 16-megapixel sensor and a long, 10x optical zoom lens. It's a useful device to put in your pocket for those opportune moments when you want to capture a street scene or a funny-looking cloud, but its image quality, while very decent overall, isn't great.
- Easy to use
- 10x zoom
- Noticeable blurring at the edges
- Didn't always handle exposure correctly
The Lumix DMC-SZ1 is a small camera with a big lens that's easy to carry around for everyday use. However, its image quality isn't great, with some noticeable blurring and occasional mishandling of exposures.
Price$ 227.00 (AUD)
Features and performance
The design of the Lumix DMC-SZ1 is similar to the Lumix DMC-SZ7, from the body shape to the control layout and the lens, but it's on the inside where the difference lies. The difference is the sensor, which in the SZ1 is a 16-megapixel CCD sensor; it's not as good as the 14-megapixel MOS sensor in the SZ7. Images from the SZ1 are decent for use with Facebook or other sites where the size will be kept relatively small (so are images from a phone for that matter), but imperfections will be noticeable when they are viewed at a large size.
In particular, the SZ1 struggles to keep the edges of a photo as clear as the centre of the frame, which can cause landscape images to look messy. Furthermore, the perspectives of straight lines towards the edges of the frame tend to look noticeably skewed. Chromatic aberration was noticeable in some scenes of high contrast (such as tree branches shot against the sky) and the camera didn't always handle highlights properly in our tests photos, greatly overexposing them. Colours were also underdone in photos that were taken in shade or dimly-lit conditions — many photos required adjustments on the computer to add some contrast and saturation (our sample images are untouched though, apart for resizing to fit this page).
The SZ1 is a largely automatic camera that doesn't provide many opportunities for adjusting the exposure. The best you can do is play with the exposure compensation to darken or brighten a scene, and you can change the ISO speed and white balance manually if you are in program mode — all this can be done through the convenient Q.Menu. Primarily, this camera is designed to be used in its intelligent auto mode, which can apply scene settings once the lighting conditions are detected. In one scenario during our tests, it added a fill-in flash when shooting in a shaded area, which would have been okay if we were shooting a portrait, but we just wanted to get the scene as a whole. Regular auto mode and scene modes (including sweeping panorama) can be selected as well.
While the picture quality of the SZ1 may not be great, it's very decent and it's a camera that might suit some users' needs quite well, especially because it has a large zoom lens. It can be a neat little unit to carry with you in the city, for example, if you want to take wide-angled shots of buildings and then zoom in on their details. It can even be used for macros, allowing you to get the front of the lens as close as a couple of centimetres away from your subject. It's an easy camera to use, too, with logically laid out controls and a noticeable half-step in the shutter for focusing, and its focusing performance wasn't bad — it picked up our intended focal point with ease most of the time and it was easy to change from area focusing to tracking or face detection through the Q.Menu when in the normal auto mode.
You'll need to use the exposure compensation button (the +/- button on the back) in order to get the best out of this camera in our opinion, and you'll also need to make sure that you frame your photos so that your intended subject of focus is smack-bang in the middle of the frame. Mostly, though, if you can afford it, we think you should pick up the SZ7 instead. It's a better camera despite having less megapixels, but it costs about $30 more.
- Highly flexible lens--short and long. You charge the battery while it's in the camera--quick and easy.
- no viewfinder, no single all-auto button, large instruction manual is included on CD
- • • •
I love my tiny Canon SD780 (makes this Panasonic look rather large). But the lens is 4:1, and I wanted both wider angle as well as telephoto views. This one provides both at a third to a quarter of the price Amazon is now getting for the SD780. I wish it had an all-auto button that enables the photographer to simply shoot, disregarding all settings (the Canon has such a button). But it's simple enough and intuitive. (Panasonic provides a 125 pp. instruction manual--on CD. I sort of resent having to use that much paper and ink to have an instruction manual). What "sold" me on this camera was "Consumer Reports" most recent camera rankings. This was by far the most fully featured, least expensive camera among their top 8 sub-compact cameras. And the actual price (from Amazon) was under $120 w postage--considerably less than the price listed by CR. I was impressed with the photos and movies I captured with it this summer on a Washington D.C. trip. I haven't had a chance to compare them side by side with some shots from my Canon. (It would be 4 and a half stars with a hard-copy instruction manual.) I should add that being able to charge the battery while it's in the camera is a rare convenience after losing the external charger for the Canon.
Latest News Articles
- Samsung Galaxy S5 specs appear online with Quad HD display
- PayPal DDoS attackers plead guilty, some may walk free
- China Bitcoin exchange head 'surprised' at speed of regulations
- 'ZeroAccess' click-fraud botnet disrupted, but not dead yet
- Google to let users download portable file with all their Gmail messages
Most Popular Articles
- 1 What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- 2 Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- 3 Windows 7 Home Premium vs. Windows 7 Professional
- 4 How do I connect my TV to the Internet?
- 5 Samsung’s 2013 Smart TVs: everything you need to know
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Best Deals on PCWorld
- Digital CamerasView all »
- Digital VideoView all »
- NotebooksView all »
- Desktop PCsView all »
- TabletsView all »