Hearts of Iron III
One of the most noticeable differences in Hearts of Iron III has to be the game's new design focus
- Diplomacy now gives players more options
- Some poor design decisions, bugs
From the start, we wanted to like Hearts of Iron III. Everything is in place for an absolutely great game that's unfortunately bogged down in a mess of bad design decisions, bugs and some odd gameplay changes. There's no doubt that fans of the series will look past the games faults as they are now and find what's enjoyable, but ultimately the most disappointing thing about the latest Hearts of Iron is the fact that fans will need to look past so many of them.
Price$ 69.95 (AUD)
Most Paradox fans - not to mention those looking for a solid World War II grand-strategy game - are sure to feel daunted by Hearts of Iron III. When one looks at the newest addition to the series and compares it to the previous instalments, they'll very quickly notice that the level of complexity has been ratcheted up by several degrees in Hearts of Iron III.
One of the most noticeable differences in Hearts of Iron III has to be the game's new design focus. In previous Hearts of Iron installations, in-game provinces could be hundreds of kilometres in width, and whole corps would be moved around with a click of a button. Hearts of Iron III's new design focus has been focused downwards - for example, the amount of provinces that you'll be fighting over has increased by what seems to be a factor of four or five and frequently, in even the most fought over fronts, provinces will be held by a mere two or three brigades of troops. Fairly streamlined affairs such as diplomacy and tech research have also been bolstered in complexity.
In some ways this is a positive boon to the player - diplomacy now gives players more options, allowing for countries to purchase licenses to build units they might not otherwise be able to produce or giving Axis members the ability to declare limited wars. The amount of things that need doing in Hearts of Iron III can be a little daunting, especially at first, and have also included the ability to allow the computer to take over just about anything to allow you to focus on specific issues.
Not everything benefits from this increase in complexity though. Indeed, in many ways parts of Hearts of Iron III have arguably become worse than in previous instalments. Take research, for instance: in the second game, nations had one to five research teams with which they could research things such as new battleship or tank designs. It was simple, yet still allowed for both major and minor powers to research effectively. This system has been done away with for a more complex system in Hearts of Iron III, where players now research component parts to units such as tanks.
Where in the previous system you'd research the tank itself, you now research its engine, gun, armour, and reliability. Moreover, each nation can now research only so much as its leadership points allow - an all encompassing resource that needs to be divided between not only research, but also spy production, diplomatic action points, and officer training. This is all well and good for larger nations, but smaller nations are now generally penalised to a greater degree than was ever seen previously and tend to lag far behind their historical counterparts.
Criticism aside, the real focus for the Hearts of Iron series has always been fighting the war and in this regard there's no question that Hearts of Iron III has made great strides. Once again, Paradox has made this much more complex than it used to be. Where in the last game you could often keep an easy tab on even the vast Eastern Front, allowing players to what you were doing at all times and crush the enemy AI with ease.
Fighting the war is now truly daunting, but for the appropriate reasons. Paradox has shifted the focus so that you will now devise the composition of your own division via a new command structure. This means that brigades are put in divisions, divisions into corps, corps into armies, and so forth. Moreover, you can now command these forces to take or hold objectives while the AI will then attempt to do manage with the forces its designated forces. Some players may wish to keep the whole thing under their control, but it never seems as though this is an unambiguously better or worse choice than previous Hearts of Iron titles.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Samsung portable 1TB T3 drive
UE Boom 2 Bluetooth speaker
Linksys AC5400 MU-MIMO Gigabit router
Smart LED Bulb LB130
Everki ContemPRO Roll Top Laptop Backpack
Epson EcoTank Expression ET-2500
Microsoft L5V-00027 Sculpt Ergonomic Keyboard Desktop
Lexar® Portable SSD
Logitech G403 Prodigy mouse
Lexar® JumpDrive® S45 USB 3.0 flash drive
Belkin MIXIT Metallic Lightning to USB Cable
3SIXT Ultra HD Sports Action Camera
Google Daydream VR headset
Huawei Mate 9
Acer Swift 7
Blade 28 backpack by Arc’teryx
Audio-Technica ATH-ANC70 Noise Cancelling Headphones
Dell XPS 13 laptop
HD Pan/Tilt Wi-Fi Camera with Night Vision NC450
HP Pavilion x360 13”
Dell Inspiron 5000 series 2-in-1
Lexar® Professional 1800x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards
Lexar® JumpDrive® C20c USB Type-C flash drive
Surface Pro 4
Garmin Fenix Chronos smartwatch
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Huawei Mate 9 full in-depth smartphone review
- 2 ZTE Axon 7 review: Is ZTE dumping old stock on Australia?
- 3 Oppo R9s smartphone full review
- 4 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 5 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
Latest News Articles
- You can download Nintendo's Fire Emblem Heroes for iOS and Android today
- Nintendo's Fire Emblem Heroes looks sharp, but will it survive the freemium transition?
- Nintendo's bringing Super Mario Run to Android in March, but Fire Emblem's coming first
- The Switch is a mix of Nintendo's past consoles
- Dead Rising 4 impressions: 'Tis the season to BBQ zombies with your flaming sword
PCW Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
- How to quit Pokemon Go (or to start enjoying it again)
- Huawei Mate 9 full in-depth smartphone review
- Time to ditch Foxtel and the iQ3: How to replace Foxtel packages with cheaper alternatives
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCSecurity Analyst - multiple rolesACT
- CCWicked Front-End DeveloperQLD
- TPTechnical Support Resource-Skype for BusinessVIC
- CCSenior Automation TesterQLD
- FTFront End DeveloperQLD
- CCTest AnalystWA
- CCTechnical Support AnalystACT
- TPDrupal Developer - Immediate startQLD
- FTDynamics AX Functional Consultant (Supply Chain Modules)QLD
- TPTechnical ConsultantNSW
- CCCloud Security Solutions Architect - Finance - Contract - Sydney CBDNSW
- FTSenior Business AnalystNSW
- TPIT Project ManagerNSW
- FTDynamics AX Functional Consultant (Supply Chain Modules)NSW
- FTDynamics AX Functional ConsultantACT
- TPInsights ManagerWA
- FTFull Stack Developer (Front and Back end)QLD
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Finance ConsultantWA
- FTDynamics AX Functional Consultant (Sales & Marketing Modules)QLD
- FTOracle Forms PL/SQL Analyst ProgrammerQLD
- FTOnline Solutions AnalystNSW
- FTFull Stack Web Developer .NET or JAVANSW
- CCIT Business AnalystNSW
- TPTechnical Report EditorQLD
- FTSenior Java EngineerACT