Parrot AR.Drone quadricopter
Parrot's AR.Drone is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that uses Wi-Fi technology to connect to an iPad, iPhone or iPod Touch.
- It's a flying quadricopter controlled via an iPod touch, iPhone, or iPad, straightforward setup, easy to control for stable flight indoors
- Almost impossible to control with any accuracy outdoors with even slight wind, 12 minute battery life, expensive price, questionable build quality considering it does fly, and therefore crash from time to time
The Parrot AR.Drone quadricopter is a toy packed with technology that is surprisingly stable and intuitive to fly. Yes, the Parrot AR.Drone is expensive, has mediocre battery life and becomes an out of control missile if used with any sort of wind. It also could be better equipped to deal with accidents. At the end of the day, this is a remote control chopper that you fly using your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch. And it's pretty damn cool.
Price$ 349.00 (AUD)
Today's forecast: wind
In addition to indoor flying, Parrot claims the AR.Drone is usable outdoors with winds up to 16kmph. Let's get one thing straight; you will want to pick a day with virtually no wind to fly without any issues, as the AR.Drone is anything but stable with even minor wind. We attempted to fly it in a park, where out flight was protected by the surrounding trees and bushes, and let's say we experienced quite a few accidents. The AR.Drone also strayed from its usual straight flight path as it left the ground, making it very tough to control with any sort of accuracy or confidence.
The Parrot AR.Drone has been designed to fly outdoors, but it doesn't take too kindly to even light winds.
Even though the AR.Drone's light, foam build helps it fly smoothly, it means the build quality does suffer. Wear and tear on the indoor hull was apparent after just a few flights, with the foam chipping and cracking in various parts. However, the body of the AR.Drone itself — constructed from carbon fibre and what Parrot describes as "high resistance" plastic — seemed to handle the elements relatively well. All the replacement parts can be purchased separately.
Now, that battery…
Unfortunately, the battery life of the AR.Drone simply sucks. The included Lithium-ion battery gives you just 12 minutes of flying time before needing to be recharged for an hour and a half. You can always purchase a second battery, but this would still only provide 24 minutes of flying time; hardly enough for a very expensive toy that you'll want to be using as much as possible.
Parrot includes two interchangeable hulls in the sales package; the first is for indoors and protects the blades from crashes thanks to large, circular rings, while the second is for outdoor flying and leaves the blades exposed. The indoor hull definitely looks more impressive, but is not recommended for outdoor use.
The Parrot AR.Drone comes with two hulls, the above is for indoor use and protects the blades from crashes.
The Parrot AR.Drone is available in Australia for $349, and will be sold exclusively through selected Telstra and Fone Zone stores.
Stay up to date with the latest reviews. Sign up to GoodGearGuide’s Gear Daily newsletters
Follow GoodGearGuide on Twitter: @Goodgearguide
Become a fan of GoodGearGuide on Facebook: Become a fan of GoodGearGuide on Facebook
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 3 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 4 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 5 MSI GS70 laptop review
Latest News Articles
- Dead Rising 4 impressions: 'Tis the season to BBQ zombies with your flaming sword
- This week in games: Free Titanfall 2 weekend, Star Wars Battlefront meets Rogue One
- Every new game revealed at The Game Awards 2016, from Guardians of the Galaxy to Zelda
- Watch Dogs 2 PC impressions: A smooth-running romp through meme-filled San Francisco
- Hearthstone fans now have a dedicated Skype chat room to challenge its best players
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCTest EngineerQLD
- FT2nd Line Engineer - CitrixVIC
- CCEOI - TIBCO DeveloperQLD
- CCMainframe ArchitectVIC
- FTSystem Engineer - VirtulisationNSW
- FTProject Manager (Cyber Security) - Permanent - IT Services - North Ryde areaNSW
- TPJava Developer - ContractQLD
- CCSystem AdministratorACT
- FTDesktop Delivery Team LeaderQLD
- CCSenior Front End DeveloperQLD
- FTDevelopment Manager / Engineering Manager - Canberra RoleACT
- TPProject ManagerVIC
- CCInfrastructure Solutions Architect - ParramattaNSW
- FTSenior Technical LeadNSW
- CCSystems Administrator :SCCMWA
- FTFront End DeveloperVIC
- FTSenior Python DeveloperVIC
- CCSecurity SpecialistVIC
- FTSoftware Sales & BDMNSW
- CCAutoCAD Business System Analyst/ GIS, Spatial AnalystNSW
- FTBusiness Analyst - SQLNSW
- CCSenior Web Content AuthorACT
- CCSenior Performance Test AnalystOther
- CCCX Program LeadNSW
- CCProduct OwnerNSW