Parrot AR.Drone quadricopter

Parrot's AR.Drone is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that uses Wi-Fi technology to connect to an iPad, iPhone or iPod Touch.

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now 2
Parrot AR.Drone
  • Parrot AR.Drone
  • Parrot AR.Drone
  • Parrot AR.Drone

Pros

  • It's a flying quadricopter controlled via an iPod touch, iPhone, or iPad, straightforward setup, easy to control for stable flight indoors

Cons

  • Almost impossible to control with any accuracy outdoors with even slight wind, 12 minute battery life, expensive price, questionable build quality considering it does fly, and therefore crash from time to time

Bottom Line

The Parrot AR.Drone quadricopter is a toy packed with technology that is surprisingly stable and intuitive to fly. Yes, the Parrot AR.Drone is expensive, has mediocre battery life and becomes an out of control missile if used with any sort of wind. It also could be better equipped to deal with accidents. At the end of the day, this is a remote control chopper that you fly using your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch. And it's pretty damn cool.

Would you buy this?

  • Buy now (Selling at 2 stores)

  • Parrot AR.Drone 2.0 Indoor Hull With Stickers 395.00
See all prices

Today's forecast: wind

In addition to indoor flying, Parrot claims the AR.Drone is usable outdoors with winds up to 16kmph. Let's get one thing straight; you will want to pick a day with virtually no wind to fly without any issues, as the AR.Drone is anything but stable with even minor wind. We attempted to fly it in a park, where out flight was protected by the surrounding trees and bushes, and let's say we experienced quite a few accidents. The AR.Drone also strayed from its usual straight flight path as it left the ground, making it very tough to control with any sort of accuracy or confidence.

Parrot AR.Drone review
The Parrot AR.Drone has been designed to fly outdoors, but it doesn't take too kindly to even light winds.

Even though the AR.Drone's light, foam build helps it fly smoothly, it means the build quality does suffer. Wear and tear on the indoor hull was apparent after just a few flights, with the foam chipping and cracking in various parts. However, the body of the AR.Drone itself — constructed from carbon fibre and what Parrot describes as "high resistance" plastic — seemed to handle the elements relatively well. All the replacement parts can be purchased separately.

Now, that battery…

Unfortunately, the battery life of the AR.Drone simply sucks. The included Lithium-ion battery gives you just 12 minutes of flying time before needing to be recharged for an hour and a half. You can always purchase a second battery, but this would still only provide 24 minutes of flying time; hardly enough for a very expensive toy that you'll want to be using as much as possible.

Parrot includes two interchangeable hulls in the sales package; the first is for indoors and protects the blades from crashes thanks to large, circular rings, while the second is for outdoor flying and leaves the blades exposed. The indoor hull definitely looks more impressive, but is not recommended for outdoor use.

Parrot AR.Drone review
The Parrot AR.Drone comes with two hulls, the above is for indoor use and protects the blades from crashes.

The Parrot AR.Drone is available in Australia for $349, and will be sold exclusively through selected Telstra and Fone Zone stores.

Stay up to date with the latest reviews. Sign up to GoodGearGuide’s Gear Daily newsletters

Follow GoodGearGuide on Twitter: @Goodgearguide

Become a fan of GoodGearGuide on Facebook: Become a fan of GoodGearGuide on Facebook

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Read more on these topics: apple ipad, games, iPhone, ipod touch

Be the first to comment.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the PC World comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?