Rock Digital Photo Frame
- Attractive design, price, video playback
- No integrated memory, some image quality issues
The Rock Digital Photo Frame isn't the best frame on the market, but it will appeal to those on a budget.
Price$ 249.00 (AUD)
Commanding a price far lower than its competitors, the Rock Digital Photo Frame is an attractive and affordable solution for displaying your digital photographs. It has an 8in screen capable of displaying images or video, and also plays background music for your photo slideshows. Unfortunately, the image quality is fairly average, the unit has no internal memory, and it is a little frustrating to use - flaws that may cause consumers to look its more expensive brethren.
The key concern for any digital photo frame is image quality. The Rock looks good from a distance of around a metre and will suffice for regular picture viewing, but upon closer inspection, there are undeniable problems with the unit. These include noticeable pixelation, some inaccurate colour reproduction and areas where contrast is lacking. This results in some skin tones looking too red, meaning areas of contrast appear blocky and pixelated. This isn't a massive mess of pixels - not by a long shot - but compared to other units on the market, it comes out second best. Considering the cost of the Rock though, certain quality concerns will need to be somewhat forgiven.
The Rock has no built-in memory so in order to display images you'll need to plug in either a USB memory stick or a supported memory card format (SD/MMC/MS). With competitors offering a paltry amount of storage, Rock has missed a prime opportunity to include a large amount of integrated flash memory as a drawing point; the ability to use the frame as a photo archive could have been excellent.
The speed of the frame is quite good with small image appearing almost immediately. Larger resolution images do take a few seconds to render, but this isn't a problem. The frame only supports the JPEG file format, so you can't use it with cameras that shoot in TIFF or RAW modes.
The Rock also supports video playback in either AVI or MPEG formats and the quality is on-par with the still image quality. Pixelation, colour inaccuracies and contrast stepping are present again. We were a little puzzled as to why it supports video, as this feature makes it more like a portable media player with a large screen, especially considering it supports MP3 and WMA playback as well.
The integrated speakers leave a lot to be desired but music and movie audio doesn't sound completely savage. Music support means you can add a musical track to a series of photos and show them off to friends in a slideshow.
The design of the Rock is very similar to the Philips 9FF2M4 Digital Photo Frame, but the bezel is white instead of black. It has solid build quality with a metal stand. The controls are located at the top of the device but they are a little frustrating to use due to their position and size. The unit is powered by an included AC power adapter.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 2 Sony Xperia XZ review: turbo-charged last-gen phone
- 3 Hisense Series 7 ULED 4K UHD TV review
- 4 Sony X9300D and X8500D UHD 4K TV review
- 5 Moto X Force review: Leading features from a mid-range phone
Latest News Articles
- This disinfection robot can light the way to cleaner hospitals
- Game on: Alienware's 20-year affair with gaming helps drive the future of VR
- Microsoft opens HoloLens preorders in Australia
- Hands-on: Sony N is a Google Glass for your neck, with an assistant named Nigel
- Oculus reveals Touch VR controller pricing and launch info, US$49 Oculus Earbuds
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: The new best Android phone
- Japan Robot, gadget and car expo slideshow
- Panasonic DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review: Best all-round TV ever?
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCSenior Business AnalystVIC
- FTSystems Engineer - Managed Service Provider - No two days are the sameNSW
- CCWeb DeveloperNSW
- FTFront End DeveloperSA
- CCContract Analyst Programmer (HTML/JAVA/J2EE) 161025/AP/862Asia
- CCAnalyst Programmer (12-Month Renewable Contract)Asia
- FTSOE ConsultantACT
- CCSnr Business AnalystVIC
- CCSenior Web DeveloperNSW
- FTSolutions ArchitectNSW
- CCFront End Developer (UI) - 12 Month ContractNSW
- CCSenior Project Specialist - SchedulingVIC
- CCPHP DeveloperNSW
- FTCapacity PlannerNSW
- CCJunior Programmer (Application Dev. & Mgt.) 161017/JP/221Asia
- CCContract Junior Programmer (PC LAN Support) 161028/JP/203Asia
- CCPerformance AnalystNSW
- CCSenior Security EngineerNSW
- CCService Analyst (12-month contract)Asia
- CCContract Analyst Programmer (JAVA/SQL/Web) 161026/AP/632Asia
- CCSenior Siebel DeveloperACT
- CCSAP FIORIACT
- CCContract IT Helpdesk Support (Lotus Notes) 161007/ITHS/vmpAsia
- FTWeb DeveloperNSW