First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
Sapphire ATI Radeon X1800 XL
ATI looks to be teeing up its latest batch of graphics chips so here's a little glimpse of what the new-look Radeons promise to deliver. Enter the X1800 XL, which opens the door to an entirely new ATI architecture.
- New design keeps everything flowing smoothly, Optimised Z-buffer and pixel shaders
- Doesn't fare so well against its direct rivals
The X1800 XL ships with some slick new structural improvements, but this doesn't translate to a much improved performance.
Price$ 860.00 (AUD)
Most of the new technology revolves around increasing efficiency. For example, the way memory is used has been comprehensively rejigged. In ATI's new design, the memory controller receives a lot of support from the rest of the card, thus allowing it to keep everything flowing more smoothly. The Z-buffer (which stops the card from drawing unnecessary pixels) has been optimised - ATI reckons the system catches 50 to 60 percent more than before - and pixel shaders are more carefully handled as well.
So with these improvements, plus the Avivo functions for boosting video and display output, you've got a pretty irresistible package, right? Well, we wouldn't exactly go that far.
The new architecture may be extremely efficient, but this didn't really show up in our tests. Visually it was pretty much on a par with its biggest rival, the GeForce 7800 GT, but only in Splinter Cell did it produce any real performance advantage - and that was rarely more than 3fps (frames per second). It moved ahead on Half-Life 2 by little more than a frame, and fell behind in both Far Cry and Doom3 - dramatically, in the case of the latter. The X1800 tended to fare less well as you stacked up the detail settings.
The X1800 XL has some very nice features and the drivers have a level of programmability that mean its performance could improve markedly in coming months. In the meantime, though, it is difficult for us to recommend.
Latest News Articles
- Jawbone Mini Jambox Bluetooth speaker
- Lego Marvel Super Heroes (Xbox One)
- Foxtel Play screens on LG Smart TVs
- Rambus, Micron settle patent, antitrust disputes
- Data-stealing malware pretends to be Microsoft IIS server module
Most Popular Articles
- 1 What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- 2 Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- 3 How do I connect my TV to the Internet?
- 4 Windows 7 Home Premium vs. Windows 7 Professional
- 5 Samsung’s 2013 Smart TVs: everything you need to know
GGG Evaluation Team
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Best Deals on PCWorld
- PC ComponentsView all »
- Desktop PCsView all »
- NotebooksView all »
- Servers & StorageView all »
- Software and ServicesView all »