Sapphire ATI Radeon X1800 XL

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now 5
Sapphire ATI Radeon X1800 XL

Pros

  • New design keeps everything flowing smoothly, Optimised Z-buffer and pixel shaders

Cons

  • Doesn't fare so well against its direct rivals

Bottom Line

The X1800 XL ships with some slick new structural improvements, but this doesn't translate to a much improved performance.

Would you buy this?

  • Buy now (Selling at 5 stores)

See all prices

ATI looks to be teeing up its latest batch of graphics chips so here's a little glimpse of what the new-look Radeons promise to deliver. Enter the X1800 XL, which opens the door to an entirely new ATI architecture.

Most of the new technology revolves around increasing efficiency. For example, the way memory is used has been comprehensively rejigged. In ATI's new design, the memory controller receives a lot of support from the rest of the card, thus allowing it to keep everything flowing more smoothly. The Z-buffer (which stops the card from drawing unnecessary pixels) has been optimised - ATI reckons the system catches 50 to 60 percent more than before - and pixel shaders are more carefully handled as well.

So with these improvements, plus the Avivo functions for boosting video and display output, you've got a pretty irresistible package, right? Well, we wouldn't exactly go that far.

The new architecture may be extremely efficient, but this didn't really show up in our tests. Visually it was pretty much on a par with its biggest rival, the GeForce 7800 GT, but only in Splinter Cell did it produce any real performance advantage - and that was rarely more than 3fps (frames per second). It moved ahead on Half-Life 2 by little more than a frame, and fell behind in both Far Cry and Doom3 - dramatically, in the case of the latter. The X1800 tended to fare less well as you stacked up the detail settings.

The X1800 XL has some very nice features and the drivers have a level of programmability that mean its performance could improve markedly in coming months. In the meantime, though, it is difficult for us to recommend.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Be the first to comment.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the PC World comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?