Sapphire TOXIC HD 4850 (512MB GDDR3 PCI-E)
A taste of poison paradise
- Great performance for the asking price, reduced card size, Zalman heat-pipe fan keeps things nice and cool
- Fan obscures adjacent expansion slot, no 'ninja babe' artwork
The Sapphire TOXIC HD 4850 (512MB GDDR3 PCI-E) is an excellent factory-overclocked graphics card that will offer mainstream gamers plenty of bang for their buck. Cool, fast and energy-efficient: what's not to love?
Price$ 295.00 (AUD)
We’ve never really understood Sapphire’s decision to call its factory overclocked cards ‘toxic’. The idea of noxious chemicals simmering inside our PC doesn’t strike us as a particularly marketable image — but maybe we just need to bone up on our street lingo. Ominous naming aside, this latest addition to the Toxic range is an excellent mid-range graphics card based on the award-winning ATI Radeon HD 4850. With increased clock speeds over the standard HD 4850 board and a premium Zalman heat-pipe fan, it is arguably the ‘sickest’ Toxic card yet (sorry).
If you’ve been hiding under a rock for the past few months, allow us to give you a quick debriefing on ATI’s new Radeon 4800 Series graphics cards (of which the HD 4850 is the entry-level model). Codenamed RV770, the new chip offers some notable improvements over its RV670 predecessor; including a huge boost in the number of stream processors — up from 320 to 800. Other notable improvements include an increased transistor count (from 666 million to 965 million), a substantial leap in texture units (40, rather than 16), and a 256-bit wide memory interface.
For its Toxic edition, Sapphire has added some additional tweaks to the ATI reference board to boost its speed and efficiency. Its core clock speed now stands at 675MHz, while its memory clock speed has been increased to 1100MHz. This is an increase of 50MHz and 107Mz, respectively. In addition, the board has been extensively redesigned with an improved cooling solution tailor-made for overclockers.
With its basic, stripped-down design and lack of obligatory bimbo artwork, the Toxic HD 4850 almost looks like a self-modded DIY job. Its dimensions are significantly smaller than the standard HD 4850 board, which should prove very handy for Crossfire configurations (it also uses a single six-pin PCI-E power connector, which will reduce clutter inside your PC even further).
The board’s front is dominated by the copper Zalman heat-pipe fan, which unfortunately protrudes over the motherboard’s adjacent expansion slot. On the plus side, it allows the card to run at vastly reduced temperatures, regardless of what you throw at it. When running idle, the Toxic HD 4850’s GPU hovered at around the 40 degree mark — less than half the temperature of the ATI reference board. When under load, the card still managed to keep below 60 degrees, which is not bad for a factory-overclocked model. For hardcore gamers who want to squeeze the most out of their GPU, this cooling solution will be a big plus. It also makes for a quieter operation.
Now that we’ve taken a look at the Toxic HD 4850’s features and overall design, let’s get down to those all-important benchmarks. Just how much extra grunt does it offer over its vanilla cousin? In an attempt to find out, we compared our test results to Force3D’s Radeon HD 4850 , which is identical to the ATI reference board. The results were universally favourable.
In 3DMark 06, the Sapphire card received an overall score of 12,630. This was an improvement of 712 marks over the Force3D Radeon HD 4850. In the game F.E.A.R., the Toxic HD 4850 averaged 102 frames per second (fps), compared to 93fps from the Force3D model. Half-Life 2 also returned a faster result on the Sapphire: 176fps vs. 167fps. While none of these differences are huge, they will make a real-world difference to gaming. We also saw improvements in our DirectX 10 gaming tests. When we ran the notorious system-hog Crysis, the Toxic HD 4850 averaged 23.9fps. This was significantly faster than the Force3D card’s result of 16.7fps. The Sapphire model also trumped the Force3D in our other DX10 gaming tests, including Call of Juarez (47.9fps vs. 42.4fps) and Lost Planet: Extreme Conditions (31fps vs. 27fps).
The results speak for themselves: the Sapphire Toxic HD 4850 offers a faster performance than its Radeon equivalents for much the same price. As such, it can be viewed as an excellent choice for enthusiasts on a budget. Furthermore, the bundled software (including Cyberlink’s DVD Suite and Sapphire’s Ruby Rom) bolsters its value even further.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Epson WorkForce ET-4550
Everki ContemPRO Roll Top Laptop Backpack
Smart LED Bulb LB130
Samsung portable 1TB T3 drive
Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive
UE Boom 2 Bluetooth speaker
Epson EcoTank Expression ET-2500
Microsoft L5V-00027 Sculpt Ergonomic Keyboard Desktop
Lexar® Portable SSD
Lexar® JumpDrive® S45 USB 3.0 flash drive
3SIXT Ultra HD Sports Action Camera
Epson WorkForce DS-360W
Huawei Mate 9
Belkin MIXIT Metallic Lightning to USB Cable
Google Daydream VR headset
Acer Swift 7
Logitech G403 Prodigy mouse
Dell Inspiron 5000 series 2-in-1
HP Pavilion x360 13”
HD Pan/Tilt Wi-Fi Camera with Night Vision NC450
Blade 28 backpack by Arc’teryx
Surface Pro 4
Audio-Technica ATH-ANC70 Noise Cancelling Headphones
Lexar® Professional 1800x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards
Garmin Fenix Chronos smartwatch
Lexar® JumpDrive® C20c USB Type-C flash drive
Dell XPS 13 laptop
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Huawei Mate 9 full in-depth smartphone review
- 2 ZTE Axon 7 review: Is ZTE dumping old stock on Australia?
- 3 Oppo R9s smartphone full review
- 4 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
- 5 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
Latest News Articles
- Intel Coffee Lake 8th-gen Core processors release date rumours
- Intel's mobile future is in blazing modems as it buries Atom failure
- PC prices will continue to go up due to shortage of components
- Radeon Vega vs. GeForce GTX 1080 Ti? AMD, Nvidia announce dueling events at GDC 2017
- Toshiba's in chaos, but not quitting PCs -- yet
PCW Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
- How to quit Pokemon Go (or to start enjoying it again)
- Huawei Mate 9 full in-depth smartphone review
- Time to ditch Foxtel and the iQ3: How to replace Foxtel packages with cheaper alternatives
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- TPSenior Business Project ManagerNSW
- TPAnalyst Workplace SupportVIC
- TPDigital Project ManagerVIC
- FTDeveloper - Java/J2EEQLD
- CCLevel 1/2 SAP Support AnalystACT
- CCSenior Technical Business Analyst - Wealth AdviceNSW
- TPWinforms DevelopersWA
- FTSenior Software Engineer x 2 - Adelaide Based (PV, NV2 or NV1 required)VIC
- CCCloud Security Solutions Architect - Finance - Contract - Sydney CBDNSW
- CCDevops Consultant - 12 month contractVIC
- FTConsultant Business AnalystQLD
- FTMid-Level Software Engineer x 2 - Adelaide Based (PV, NV2 or NV1 required)VIC
- TPDeployment Specialist (DevOps)QLD
- TPSenior Java Developer / DevOps - ContractQLD
- FTSenior Java EngineerACT
- FTDeveloper - XML & JavaVIC
- CCDigital Communications ManagerNSW
- FTIT Information Security AdvisorNSW
- CCSenior Technical Consultant - MicrosoftACT
- CCProject Manager - Adelaide basedNSW
- FTInfrastructure Solution ArchitectSA
- TPProject ManagerOther
- CCBusiness Test Lead - BRT/UATNSW
- FTEnterprise ArchitectQLD
- CCMidrange ProvisioningNSW