Sennheiser CX 300
- Aesthetically pleasing, Excellent bass levels, Price
- Mid Range lacks some detail
For their price, the CX 300’s offer a more than adequate replacement for your standard iPod headphones in terms of sound quality; and you’ll also be pretty pleased with their bass levels.
Price$ 79.95 (AUD)
We've reviewed plenty of headphones here at the GoodGearGuide. So much so that our editor seems intent on going into a fit as soon as we even begin to mention the dreaded 'H' word. However, when we heard about the Sennheiser CX 300, we weren't prepared to let this opportunity slip, despite what the boss thinks. [Editor's Note: This is otherwise known as a CLM (Career Limiting Move)].
The CX 300's are consumer ear-canal phones which are targeted at younger customers who prefer small ear-buds, but still want quality sound, and let's face it; most of the headphones that are packed in with any sort of music players are as far away from quality as you could imagine. Trust us. So, do the CX 300's stack up?
Well, we definitely think so. For starters, they are quite attractive. We tested the Silver model, which uses a black cord and ear buds, and the colour contrast is quite aesthetically pleasing. The earphone itself is finished in two tones of silver; a brushed look (if you look really close) for the rounded ends and more of a chrome finish on the ring which holds the seal. The earphones themselves are quite small, and when they are firmly in your ear, they aren't the type to attract any unwanted attention. In fact, we feel that they are perfect for those trips to and from work on the train.
For canal phones to be effective, a perfect fit is needed inside your ear. To help you as much as possible in your quest to achieve this, Sennheiser has included three interchangeable rubber ear adapters (small, medium and large sizes). Unfortunately only rubber ear tips are included; many other companies who produce canal phones also include different style foam tips, which provide an even better seal than the rubber ones. Still, this is a matter of personal opinion and with the three different sizes offered, we feel that whatever you ear size you should be able to get a perfect fit with at least one.
Now for the crunch; sound quality. You'll be pleased to hear that we were quite happy with the CX 300's. They aren't going to make you sit up and scream out "wow", but they do the job they are intended to do and all in all, they do it pretty well. For this price, we can't complain at all. They provide a solid level of sound and certainly heap more misery on the poor headphones that are packed with MP3 players.
Undoubtedly the best feature of the CX 300's is the powerful bass they provide. While canal phones tend to shy away from bass, the CX 300's have taken a different turn, providing deep, powerful bass without ruining the clarity in the higher ranges. The bass is not overwhelming at all and it seems as though Sennheiser has struck an almost perfect balance juggling this important quality with the mid range. The latter isn't as detailed or responsive as some other models, but we are talking a pretty substantial difference in price here, so this is understandable.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
- 3 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 4 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 5 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
Latest News Articles
- Apple's AirPods could deliver audio with multiple wireless protocols
- First look: Nuheara IQbuds smart Bluetooth ear buds do more than just music
- Convoy International restructures business focus
- Beats Solo2 headphones go wireless for $399
- Astro A38 review: A staggering price to pay for convenience
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTBrand Marketing Manager - Premium Entertainment BrandNSW
- FTTechnical Consultant MS Dynamics AXWA
- FTLevel 2 Service DeskNSW
- CCBiztalk DeveloperVIC
- FTInfrastructure Solution ArchitectSA
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Finance ConsultantWA
- TPLevel 3 Systems EngineerWA
- FTDeveloper - Java, Mule ESBNSW
- CCApplication PackagerVIC
- CCFIS Connex Developer (Brisbane Based)NSW
- FTLevel 3 EngineerNSW
- FTAccount Delivery LeadNSW
- FTTechnical ExpertNSW
- CCCapacity and Performance Analyst - Mainframe - Z SystemsVIC
- CCFIS Connex Developer (Brisbane Based)WA
- TPProject Manager with a Development BackgroundQLD
- TPSharePoint SpecialistVIC
- TPInternal Controls Specialist - BAQLD
- CCDevops EngineerVIC
- CCTest AnalystQLD
- CCVirtualization ArchitectACT
- FTIT Field EngineerNSW
- FTLevel 3 Support ConsultantNSW
- FTBusiness Solutions SpecialistNSW
- TPOracle DeveloperVIC