Sennheiser PXC 300
- Foldable, very comfortable, good quality sound, noise reduction
- Ears become hot after prolonged use, lacks bass, battery pack bulky and heavy
An excellent choice for those who like the noise reduction feature, but the bulky battery pack is a major disadvantage.
Price$ 399.95 (AUD)
The Sennheiser PXC 300 is a foldable set of noise-cancelling headphones with excellent sound quality, but a lack of bass and a chunky battery pack detract from this otherwise excellent model.
The PXC 300 is an over-the-head design with adjustable aluminum side pieces and leather cups surrounding the earphones. We were impressed with the leather padding, which creates a better seal around the ears to minimise outside noise. However, we were disappointed to learn that after wearing the headphones for a little while, our ears became very warm, enough to make it a problem during hot weather.
Weighing 100g, we found the PXC 300 very comfortable for a vast variety of uses, including train and bus travel. The leather padding on the top of the over-the-ear frame sits well on the head and overall, the headphones feel light. They're also easily foldable. Simply turn over the earphones, and fold the side pieces and the PXC 300 can easily be slipped into the supplied protection case.
The PXC 300 can be used as an ordinary set of headphones, via a switch on the battery pack. This means the noise reduction feature can be turned off and on, depending on the situation and surroundings. However, the sound quality is decreased when the noise cancellation feature is deactivated and this isn't recommended--although it does conserve battery life.
During testing, the NoiseGard feature reduced the background noise to a bare minimum. This was especially evident on a crowded peak hour train and only very loud sounds could be heard. In terms of sound quality, the treble and mid-tones were significantly impressive, although we felt the unit lacked a little in terms of bass.
The most disappointing aspect of the PXC 300 is its battery pack, which is very large and heavy. Measuring 134mm in length and running on two standard AAA batteries, the pack feels too heavy to be attached to a shirt or belt and may be difficult to place in a bag unless it is very close to the headphones.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 2 Sony Xperia XZ review: turbo-charged last-gen phone
- 3 Hisense Series 7 ULED 4K UHD TV review
- 4 Sony X9300D and X8500D UHD 4K TV review
- 5 Moto X Force review: Leading features from a mid-range phone
Latest News Articles
- First look: Nuheara IQbuds smart Bluetooth ear buds do more than just music
- Convoy International restructures business focus
- Beats Solo2 headphones go wireless for $399
- Astro A38 review: A staggering price to pay for convenience
- Parrot's Zik 2.0 headphones include an accelerometer and plenty of noise cancelling
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: The new best Android phone
- Japan Robot, gadget and car expo slideshow
- Panasonic DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review: Best all-round TV ever?
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCSAP ERP ArchitectNSW
- CCTechnical Business Analyst - Wealth/Super backgroundNSW
- FTSOE ArchitectNSW
- CCContract IT Assistant (PC LAN Support) 161020/ITA/652Asia
- FTSalesforce Subject Matter ExpertNSW
- CCeCommerce Project ManagerNSW
- CCSenior Project Manager (Marketing Automation)NSW
- CCProject ManagerACT
- CCUnix Project LeadNSW
- CCSalesforce DeveloperNSW
- CCDevOps EngineerNSW
- CCWeb Analytics AnalystNSW
- FTSenior MS Dynamics CRM ConsultantSA
- FTSolution ArchitectACT
- CCServiceNow ConsultantNSW
- FTLevel 2 Application SupportVIC
- CCBusiness AnalystNSW
- CCContract Junior Programmer (Internet/ Intranet) 161025/JP/vhaAsia
- CCSenior Business Analyst, Margin ProjectsNSW
- CCOracle Functional Consultant | 6mth ContractVIC
- CCFront End DeveloperNSW
- CCCloud Security Services SpecialistVIC
- CCTechnical Test AnalystACT
- CCTesting Capability LeadNSW