Sony A900 (DSLR-A900)
Sony brings more megapixels to the table, serving up one of the most delicious full-frame D-SLR cameras on the market.
- Comfortable to use, manual controls for metering and focus modes, fast, full-frame sensor, huge resolution
- Noticeable noise at ISO speeds above 400
Anyone looking to make the step up to a full-frame D-SLR should make a point of trying out the Sony A900. It's a great camera to use and its performance on location and in the studio was excellent.
Price$ 5,299.00 (AUD)
With a full-frame, 35mm sensor and 26 megapixels to its name, the Sony A900 (DSLR-A900) digital SLR camera is a super-heavyweight when it comes to churning out huge images. It eclipses even the high-end models from Canon and Nikon in resolution (it only just beats the Nikon D3x), and its mid-range price of $5299 (for the body only) is sure to arouse interest from serious enthusiasts as well as professionals looking to get a high return on their investment.
The A900 uses Sony’s a Mount and will accept lenses from Sony and Minolta; we used a Sony SAL-2470Z 24-70mm f/2.8 zoom lens for our tests. This is a serious piece of glass that on its own costs around $2400, and combined with the A900 body it helped produce some crisp and colourful images. It also helped add about 1kg to the overall weight of the camera; it’s definitely a big boy!
When you first start using the Sony A900, it’s easy to get accustomed to all its buttons and dials. There are dedicated dials for the aperture and shutter, as well as switches for the focus and metering modes, which we love. A thumb control allows you to navigate the on-screen menu system, as well as change focus points on the fly, which we also love. There are nine focus points to select from, and we had no problems focusing on our target areas off-centre. However, we do wish that all the focus points showed up as red squares in the viewfinder, rather than thin lines.
The A900 focused fast with the f/2.8 lens and took shots even quicker. It has a crisp shutter that reacts immediately when pressed, and in burst mode it can capture up to five frames per second, which is on par with the fastest professional cameras on the market. If you shoot JPEGS, it will be able to capture up to 285 frames until it slows down to catch a breath; in RAW mode it will capture up to 12 images, one less than the Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III. You can record your images to CompactFlash or Memory Stick cards, and we used a Sandisk Ultra II 1GB card for our tests.
In low light, the camera’s ISO can be boosted to 6400, but you will notice plenty of artefacts in your photos. In fact, we noticed noise at ISO 400 and 800. However, the noise levels were acceptable and could be tamed during post processing.
We did the majority of our shooting in manual mode, but we also used aperture priority, in which the camera exposed almost all of our shots perfectly. When shooting in low light with the ISO mode set to auto the camera will boost the ISO speed automatically in aperture priority mode, ensuring that the shutter speed doesn’t drop too low. The image stabilisation built in to the body did a good job to keep our images acceptably clear, even while hand-holding shots with the shutter at 1/8th of a second.
Like a professional camera, the Sony A900 doesn’t have a built-in flash, but there is a hot-shoe and a connection for an external flash. When connected to a light box in a studio, the A900 performed like a true pro, capturing brilliant whites and vibrant yet neutral-looking colours.
You won’t find the Live View feature on this camera; instead, you’ll have to frame your shots using the optical viewfinder, which is large and crystal clear. You can see the mirror reflection along the bottom of the viewfinder, which can be a little off-putting, but it depends on the angle at which you are looking through it.
Despite the lack of Live View, which we don’t care for much anyway, Sony is onto a winner with the A900, as it’s an absolute joy to use and captures photos at a huge resolution. We love all of the included buttons, its menu system, the big viewfinder, the position of the shutter, and the overall size of the body; it all just works. In the end, it’s easy to recommend this camera for people who are in the market for a full-frame D-SLR and want a capable alternative to Canon and Nikon.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 2 Sony Xperia XZ review: turbo-charged last-gen phone
- 3 Hisense Series 7 ULED 4K UHD TV review
- 4 Sony X9300D and X8500D UHD 4K TV review
- 5 Moto X Force review: Leading features from a mid-range phone
Latest News Articles
- Boom: SanDisk just dropped the world's largest SD card
- Camera app makers tap into RAW power with iOS, and look forward to dual lenses
- Google Camera 3.2 lets you snap pictures while recording video
- CES 2016: Top 10 trends
- Sony α7S II aimed film-makers and low light photographers
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: The new best Android phone
- Japan Robot, gadget and car expo slideshow
- Panasonic DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review: Best all-round TV ever?
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- TPIT Project Manager - Migration & TransformationNSW
- FTPortfolio ManagerVIC
- CCSenior Java DeveloperNSW
- CCFront End Developer - Mid LevelNSW
- CCBusiness Process Analyst - Telco (Sydney CBD)NSW
- CCCyber Security Analyst - TelcoVIC
- FTSolution Architect - Application IntegrationQLD
- TPSoftware Engineer - C++QLD
- CCStrategy AnalystVIC
- FTMid Level Full Stack DeveloperNSW
- FTCRM ConsultantWA
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Manufacturing ConsultantQLD
- FTFrontend DeveloperNSW
- FTSenior Analyst Programmer Payments GatewayVIC
- CCBusiness Analyst- (MQC, QTP, BPMN, Visio or System Architect;NSW
- TPPHP Junior Developer/ProgrammerQLD
- FTNetwork EngineerACT
- CCSystems Engineer - NetApp, Exchange, ADNSW
- TPBusiness AnalystQLD
- FTProject Lead / Business Analyst | SalesforceQLD
- CCService Desk ConsultantNSW
- CCSecurity Architect (Big Data / Cloud) Finance Contract Sydney CBDNSW
- CCBusiness AnalystNSW
- CCData Warehousing /Business Intelligence DeveloperACT
- CCIT Project CoordinatorNSW