First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
As one of Sony's two new high definition camcorders, the HDR-UX1 should be an attractive proposition. In many ways it is, with good quality video, a reasonable feature set and excellent construction. Unfortunately the UX1 just can't compare to its sibling, the HDR-SR1 with regards to usability. Despite being almost identical products, there is one major difference: the SR1 uses a 30GB hard disk while the UX1 uses mini DVDs, which severely limits it both in terms of recording time and playback.
- Good quality video, excellent feature set
- Can’t play the DVDs back on a regular DVD player, short recording time, lower bit rate than SR1
As the first DVD-based high definition camcorder the UX1 has good quality video, but misses out on practicality.
Price$ 2,299.00 (AUD)
Both video cameras use a 2 megapixel CMOS sensor, which provides excellent quality video at a resolution of up to 1080i. We found the picture to be crisp and sharp, with far greater detail than standard definition. Colour representation is excellent with great variation between tones and vivid primary shades. There's little sign of the compression artefacts that usually spoil DVD camera footage, and the ghosting we have come to expect from MPEG2 footage was nowhere to be seen. We did have a few minor problems in areas of high contrast, with some fringing apparent along bright borders. For the most part this wasn't noticeable, but on white areas against darker backgrounds it gave a slightly unnatural look.
Still images are about average for a camcorder of this price range, with the respectable 4 megapixel images good enough for making 6 x 4in prints. The built in flash is a useful inclusion, and the various manual options, including manual white balance, manual focus, and spot metering and focus can all be used for still images too. One set of manual options that are missing however, both for still images and video, is the ability to change aperture, shutter speed or gain. However Sony almost never includes these options, so it really came as no surprise.
Both of Sony's new high definition camcorders share some excellent features. For a start there's the inclusion of microphone and headphone jacks. This is excellent news for those who are serious about audio quality. Then there's the multi function ring. This allows the user to make fine adjustments to manual options such as focus, white balance and exposure, and makes the process far simpler than having to toggle buttons back and forth. We also appreciate the inclusion of the huge 3.5in LCD touch screen. Running a new user-friendly menu system, the UX1 is considerably more intuitive than past Sony models. The 10x optical zoom is fast and responsive, and with Sony's Steadyshot image stabilisation active we didn't had a problem with shaky pictures.
One possible limitation of the new wave of high definition camcorders is the way in which they encode their footage. Sony has used the AVCHD codec for the UX1, which is based on MPEG4. As the codec is in the early stages of adoption there are currently no editing programs available that support this format. To cut videos or make changes you'll need to use Sony's simplistic proprietary software that comes bundled in the box. The first of the mainstream editing packages will start supporting AVCHD around March 2007.
High definition footage also presents another problem for the UX1: high definition videos are understandably big. With the HDR-SR1, roughly four hours of footage could be shot at the highest quality level before filling the hard disk. However with the HDR-UX1 on its highest quality settings, which incidentally don't offer as high a bit rate as the SR1 (12Mbps versus 15Mbps), you get a meagre 15 minutes, or 30 minutes should you be using a dual layer disc (the UX1 supports DVD+/-R and RW in both single and dual layer formats). You don't need us to point out that 15 minutes isn't a lot, and for many users this figure will make the UX1 totally impractical.
The great selling point of standard definition DVD camcorders was that you could record your videos and then pop the disc straight in your DVD player to watch at home. Should you try that with discs written on the UX1 however, all you're likely to get is a nasty error message. As they use a completely different codec you'll need a High Definition capable player just to run them. The only option is to play the discs back from within the camera or copy them to a computer, so much of the ease of use of DVD camcorders is lost with this unit.
Thus we have the crux of the problem: what's the advantage over the HDR-SR1? Well it's a bit cheaper, but at this price point a few hundred dollars doesn't really make much difference. The UX1 doesn't even look as swish and attractive as the SR1. Despite these problems with usability the HDR-UX1 is still an excellent machine underneath, especially for an early AVCHD model.
Latest News Articles
- On snooping disclosures, AT&T and Internet companies are like night and day
- Yahoo buys concert live-streaming startup Evntlive
- Wall Street Beat: Tech stocks hit 13-year high
- DARPA makes finding software vulnerabilities fun
- Mobile chip speed wars have to end, Broadcom chairman says
Most Popular Articles
- 1 What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- 2 Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- 3 Windows 7 Home Premium vs. Windows 7 Professional
- 4 How do I connect my TV to the Internet?
- 5 Samsung’s 2013 Smart TVs: everything you need to know
GGG Evaluation Team
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Best Deals on PCWorld
- Digital VideoView all »
- Digital CamerasView all »
- NotebooksView all »
- Desktop PCsView all »
- TabletsView all »