Sponticelli ShakingWeb

Web browsing on the iPhone takes a turn for the worse.

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now
Sponticelli ShakingWeb
  • Sponticelli ShakingWeb
  • Sponticelli ShakingWeb
  • Sponticelli ShakingWeb

Pros

  • Hovering over links shows detailed information

Cons

  • Extremely buggy, poor idea with poor execution, lacking necessary features

Bottom Line

Sponticelli brings vibration reduction technology to a place where it wasn't needed. We can't think of a reason why anyone should pay for this app.

Would you buy this?

When Apple suddenly began allowing third-party Web browsers into the App Store (provided they are built off Web Kit), it sparked a question: is there room to improve on Safari? If ShakingWeb is any indication of the sophistication of third-party browser development for the iPhone, Apple has little to fear. Designed to make it easier to browse the Web while on public transport, the app is inferior to Safari and in no way a useful replacement.

Sponticelli has toyed with the user interface, changing Safari's greyish blue for a graphite scheme. It isn't the ugliest interface we have seen in a third-party iPhone app. ShakingWeb has most of the same controls as Safari, with a basic search bar as well as back, forward and reload controls. Unfortunately, the buttons are smaller than those in Safari; while this allows the app to maximise the screen real estate available for displaying Web pages, it makes the buttons harder to press.

Compared to Safari, the speed of ShakingWeb's user interface almost always lags — everything from clicking a link to zooming in to a Web page using multi-touch. Even screen reorientation — flipping the iPhone on its side for a wider view of a Web page — takes over four seconds, and sometimes freezes the app. Web site loading times are acceptably fast, but the cumbersome user interface makes site navigation a much poorer experience than using Safari.

Tabbed browsing, bookmarks, auto-complete and integrated search — all staples of browsing with Safari — are absent from ShakingWeb. Sponticelli admits that any link that requires a new window will not work as a result of the lack of tabbed browsing capability.

The lack of auto-complete and bookmarks forces users to type out whole Web site addresses even if they are regularly visited. Even small flaws, like automatic capitalisation, make using ShakingWeb arduous.

These failures could be dismissed if the app fulfilled its primary function of providing an easier browsing experience for public transport users. The app is based on the idea that public transport users are subjected to constant shakes and bumps, making Web browsing a difficult task. ShakingWeb uses the iPhone's integrated accelerometer to determine the amount of bumping and compensates by shaking the Web page portion of the screen. This is supposed to make it easier to read the screen.

By default, ShakingWeb will only shake the screen vertically; turn on Turbo mode and the app will shake horizontally as well. The amount of shaking that ShakingWeb applies is quite small, so the browser won't bounce around like an antiquated Windows screensaver.

Unfortunately, when we tested ShakingWeb on public transport and in other environments involving motion it did more to impair rather than improve our ability to read. The shaking isn't enough to blur the text, but it is enough to cause one's eyes to veer off focus, making reading harder.

Even if the algorithms behind ShakingWeb are tuned perfectly, the app solves a problem that no one seems to have. Even on the worst CityRail train it is generally possible to read the iPhone's screen. For those who do have a problem browsing Web sites on the iPhone in such situations, ShakingWeb will do little to help.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Be the first to comment.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the PC World comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?