First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
Front Mission Evolved
Mechs invade Xbox 360 and PS3, courtesy of Square-Ennix: but are they killer machines, or bumbling toasters?
- Solid multiplayer experience, mechs will always be cool
- Single player is boring, doesn’t really feel like you’re controlling a mech
As a standard shooter, Front Mission Evolved misses a huge opportunity, but the core mechanics are there, and if you get into the multiplayer, you’re going to have a good time.
Price$ 99.95 (AUD)
Buy now (Selling at 5 stores)
Robots and mechs are cool. It’s a fact of life that saw the rise of Transformers, and is so ingrained in our culture that even a Michael Bay/Megan Fox tag team failed to kill our fascination with big metal things ripping into each other.
It’s this attraction that Square-Ennix is banking on with Front Mission Evolved. In most ways, it’s a standard third-person shooter, but rather than control a mere human, you’re controlling a human sitting in a “Wanzer” (temptation to insert a ‘g’ rising) mech. In the end, though, it’s quite a superficial coat of digital paint.
Name aside, Wanzers don’t seem to have any real tricks that virtual humans aren’t capable of, unfortunately. They can glide across the ground in short bursts, but other than that, Front Mission is just a shiny, standard shooter. You select your weapon loadout before heading into a level (taking into account that too many weapons and armour will slow you down to a snail’s pace), and then blow stuff up.
If we’re being completely honest, developers Double Helix Games missed a real opportunity here. Despite the Wanzers towering over the surrounding buildings, tanks and people, at no stage do you feel particularly powerful. The Wanzer can take a fair bit of punishment, but then again, so can the heroes of most shooters.
The single-player mode in Evolved isn’t very evolved at all. It’s short and high energy, but ultimately quite shallow and has limited replay value. That said, it was clearly designed as a training ground for the multiplayer mode, which comprises the main meat of the game.
In concept the multiplayer mode is awesome – the levels are well designed, and once you get hooked, you’re going to plug in a lot of hours to level your profile all the way to level 70. There’s a lot of customisation you can do with your characters, and in team mode there’s a great deal of team strategy that can be built around the unique roles of those builds.
But here’s the rub – the game’s been out a little while now, and the online user base has settled down into its comfort zone. The people still playing tend to be really good, and have access to all kinds of toys and tricks a newbie is not going to understand.
In multiplayer, a great level of skill and control over the Wanzer is needed to succeed, and when the action heats up (which is often, given that the maps are quite small) the game becomes somewhat discouraging.
While I freely admit that I’m new to this kind of game and didn’t expect to excel online initially, it was quite a few matches before my kill/death ratio was even remotely reasonable. That’s discouraging for newbies, and will put many off what is essentially the main component of the game.
Once you become more confident in your abilities, however, Front Mission Evolved is a classy shooter. For it to properly compete with other online shooters though, like Call of Duty: Black Ops, it probably needed to be a little more accessible in the early stages.
Latest News Articles
- Google invites Glass wearers to brave LA's beaches
- Telerik frees HTML5 collection of components
- Space X rocket en route to ISS with space laser cargo
- AMD steers clear of low-cost tablet market
- Experts: Avoid big mistakes with Oracle's Exadata
Most Popular Articles
- 1 Top 5 reasons to hate the Samsung Galaxy S5
- 2 What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- 3 Windows 7 Home Premium vs. Windows 7 Professional
- 4 Five flaws in Samsung Galaxy S5's TouchWiz
- 5 Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
GGG Evaluation Team
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.