Supreme Commander 2
The changes Gas Powered Games made to SC2 are apparent from the very beginning
- Improvements abound -- from slight art tweaks to considerable streamlining of previously frustrating features, story and voice acting don't really sour or sweeten the campaign experience
- Still a little bit of a demanding game hardware-wise, smaller maps may rub previous SC fans the wrong way (even with better landscape design)
Featuring streamlined features, fantastic multiplayer, and various worthwhile gameplay tweaks, Supreme Commander 2 is an exceptional improvement over Gas Powered's popular 2008 RTS.
Price$ 109.95 (AUD)
Best Deals (Selling at 2 stores)
Supreme Commander was a title that lovingly embraced established RTS conventions like base building and extensive micromanagement but it also introduced new ideas like a zoom-out tactical map, physics-based weapons fire, and massive armies consisting of hundreds of units. Unfortunately, the high-end hardware requirements and complexity of the game's core concepts didn't translate into widespread commercial success; while the game was critically well-received, its popularity never matched that of rival franchises like Command & Conquer and StarCraft. Perhaps that's why Supreme Commander 2 felt like an overt attempt to address the issues that kept its predecessor from establishing itself as a legitimate threat to Blizzard and EA's dominance.
The changes Gas Powered Games made to SC2 are apparent from the very beginning. One of the first things I noticed was the game sports a new stylistic look that helps to further differentiate one faction from another; it only takes a quick glance at the screen to identify the three main factions (an Aeon ground force looks different from a fleet of Cybran boats, for instance). This new visual approach also helps keep things looking sharp without demanding a whole lot from the hardware the game is running on, and I was able to run SC2 on the default "high" setting on my mid-range PC.
I did notice some slight hiccups during some of the biggest battles or on maps with lots of water to render, but overall, the game ran smoothly and without issue. It remains to be seen how well the game will scale to lower-end systems but you don't need a top-end gaming rig to enjoy optimal performance. You can thank a modified Demigod engine -- Gas Powered Games' recently released take on the World of WarCraft 3 variant, Defense of the Ancients -- for that. It renders naturalistic environments with much more flair than the previous game's engine ever did.
Beyond their improved backdrops, game maps now eschew the previously favoured vast emptiness for a structured "arena" approach. Choke points and carefully placed resources offer much more room for strategy-oriented gamers and there's generally more variety to the types of landscapes. Some maps are enormous industrial complexes meant for large-scale four-on-four battles while others are small tropical islands perfect for one-on-on online skirmishes. The high unit cap also returns, and though I never reached the 300 unit limit, I did regularly field armies of 200 or more; having that many soldiers swarming the battlefield was more than enough to accomplish what I wanted to do, but having the extra legroom doesn't hurt.
SC2's new upgrade system is also a welcome addition. Just about every building or unit in the original game had three tiers, resulting in the player having to hunt and peck around the map for upgrades. SC2 has wisely gathered all these upgrades and placed them in a research window, which is accessible with a single click of the mouse button. Everything-from units, structures, and the commander's ACU (Armored Combat Unit) -- is upgraded through this window, which significantly reduces the player's micromanagement. I also appreciated the fact that every upgrade is retroactively applied to existing units: You feel a genuine sense of sinister glee all members of an 80-strong gunship squadron instantly gain personal shields and rapid fire. The research window is where you'll also find the real differences between the three factions, as each side's tech tree is vastly different from the other two. The factions have also been rebalanced so that each side has distinct advantages and disadvantages. The Aeon, for instance, no longer possess naval units but compensates with interesting new units like the Sea Hunter land experimental.
Of course, what makes or breaks an RTS is its online experience, and I'm happy to say that SC2 was smooth and responsive even with six A.I. and two human players sharing the battlefield. Servers weren't live at the time of my review so my online experience was limited to battles against a friend and computer-controlled enemies, but I thoroughly enjoyed utilising the strategies gleaned from the single-player campaign on actual foes. The online functionality is bare bones compared to services like Battle.net but the Steam version does come with basic stat tracking and leaderboards, so online fiends may want to consider going that route. Only time will tell if SC2's immense scale and unique upgrade tree will translate into long-term online success, but Blizzard's reticence when it comes to StarCraft 2's release date will no doubt help it gain some traction.
SC2 improves upon its predecessor by taking the franchise formula and upgrading it in a very tangible way. Most of the issues which hurt the original have been addressed, and the game's immense scale allows for some incredible battles. Add in the interesting multiplayer offerings and the friendlier system requirements, and you have an RTS that deserves some real attention from the PC community.
Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 HP Stream 11 laptop
- 2 Acer Chromebook 11 (CB3-111)
- 3 Asus Zenbook UX303LN Ultrabook
- 4 Samsung's Galaxy Alpha review: A peek into the Galaxy S6
- 5 Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro hybrid Ultrabook
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Latest News Articles
- Think North Korea hacked Sony? Think about this
- Uber temporarily suspends service in Portland
- The 'grinch' isn't a Linux vulnerability, Red Hat says
- Messaging app Line buys Microsoft's MixRadio music-streaming app
- Vulnerability in embedded Web server exposes millions of routers to hacking
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.