Budget headphones with a budget sound
- Low cost, decent mid-range
- Lack of bass, distortion, lack of detail, shrill highs, difficult to position properly
This is a fairly uninspiring set of headphones. While the price tag is extremely low, the sound quality and build are less than impressive. It's tough to recommend them, even over stock MP3 player headphones.
Price$ 9.95 (AUD)
Like the EB-300 headphones that we reviewed a little while back, TDK's EB-200s are nothing special. As their low price tag indicates, they are designed as a basic alternative to your stock MP3 player earbuds. Although they do have some redeeming features, overall we found the sound quality was quite lacking.
The biggest issue with these headphones — and it is one that is detrimental to both sound quality and comfort — is their design. Unlike the EB-300, this unit isn't an In-Ear Monitor: these headphones are standard earbuds. This means they don't slip into your ear canals, and simply rest in the outer part of the ear.
This style, coupled with the large bud design, makes it very difficult to seat the headphones properly. We often found they slipped out of position, which caused a sharp drop in audio quality. If the buds aren't resting right next to the ear canal the sound becomes weak and tinny with no bass and a fairly hefty loss of clarity. Every so often we would position them just right, but even then some slight movement made them slip right out again.
As is the case with most earbuds, the bass isn't all that great to begin with. It's tough for such a small driver to produce strong, deep low register notes; this was the weakest element of the EB-200's performance. The bass lacked power and depth and was generally quite hollow and empty.
Fortunately, the mid-range was relatively pleasing. It was a little distorted and harsh, lacking the detail of more expensive headphones, but overall it was quite rich and sweet and gave electric guitar strings a pleasant sound.
The highs were a little shrill with the same harshness mentioned before, but they were passable. The soundstage is fairly poor, but that is to be expected from entry-level earbuds. There is little in the way of three-dimensional layering or proper separation, but less discerning users will probably not notice.
Overall we wouldn't recommend these headphones for piano-based tunes or heavy bass tracks, but guitar-oriented genres such as rock and heavy metal will be adequately recreated.
As mentioned earlier, the large bud design means that comfort wise the EB-200s can be a little irritating. They move around a fair bit; however, if you can handle that or remain relatively motionless then they are fine even for long listening sessions.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 2 Sony Xperia XZ review: turbo-charged last-gen phone
- 3 Sony X9300D and X8500D UHD 4K TV review
- 4 Hisense Series 7 ULED 4K UHD TV review
- 5 Moto X Force review: Leading features from a mid-range phone
Latest News Articles
- First look: Nuheara IQbuds smart Bluetooth ear buds do more than just music
- Convoy International restructures business focus
- Beats Solo2 headphones go wireless for $399
- Astro A38 review: A staggering price to pay for convenience
- Parrot's Zik 2.0 headphones include an accelerometer and plenty of noise cancelling
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: The new best Android phone
- Japan Robot, gadget and car expo slideshow
- Panasonic DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review: Best all-round TV ever?
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCSenior C# .Net EngineerNSW
- CCLevel 3 Microsoft Resource EngineerVIC
- CCFirewall EngineerNSW
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Finance ConsultantQLD
- CCMicrosoft AX Support AnalystsQLD
- CCAgile Business AnalystVIC
- FTSolution Architect - Application/IntegrationVIC
- CCUnix Project LeadNSW
- FTWebSphere MQ Application SupportSA
- FTSenior Java ProgrammerWA
- FTSoftware Development ManagerNSW
- CCSenior Test Analyst (Brisbane Based)QLD
- CCSenior Visual DesignerNSW
- CCContract IT Assistant (UNIX/Windows) 161028/ITA/003Asia
- CCFull Stack Java DevelopersNSW
- CCStrategy AnalystVIC
- FTMid-Senior iOS DeveloperNSW
- CCSenior Software DeveloperNSW
- CCGraduate Web DeveloperWA
- CCMicrosoft Dynamics AX Solution Architect (Permanent and/or Contract Option)QLD
- CCTechnology TrainerNSW
- CCData Warehousing /Business Intelligence DeveloperACT
- CCUX LeadNSW
- CCProject Manager - Security - TelcoVIC
- CCSalesforce DeveloperNSW