Toshiba Portege R830 (PT321A-01L002) ultraportable laptop
Toshiba Portege R830 review: A 13.3in ultraportable with great features, strong build quality and excellent battery life
- Excellent performance and battery life
- Good build quality
- Plenty of built-in features
- Keyboard not backlit
- Screen not great
- Long charging time
Toshiba's Portege R830 is a great choice for business users who want something that's easily mobile, yet fully-featured and fast. It's not perfect -- it could use a better screen, a backlit keyboard and a quicker charging time -- but it's very well built and it looks good, too.
Price$ 2,667.50 (AUD)
The Toshiba Portege was one of the first ultraportable laptops on the market to still offer a full feature-set despite its small dimensions and light weight. With the Portege R830 (PT321A-01L002), that tradition of fitting lots of stuff into a small frame continues, and not only that, it also features a full-voltage, Second Generation Intel Core i5 CPU. Indeed, there are many positives about this 13.3in, 1.4kg laptop, chief among them being exceptional performance, but there are also some negatives, such as the screen, which isn't the most vibrant we've seen.
Design and specifications
Between the Toshiba Portege R830, the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 and the Samsung Notebook Series 9, the Toshiba looks most like a run-of-the-mill laptop. It doesn't have a distinct shape or Gorilla Glass like the Lenovo; it doesn't have the slim frame and svelte look of the Samsung. Nevertheless, it's still a good looking laptop and it has many features that cover the needs of both business and home users.
A matte screen is present on the R830, but it's not great. It looks very dull and can be harsh on the eyes if you leave it too bright while using the notebook in the dark. Its viewing angles are also narrow and this means you'll regularly be adjusting its angles or your seating position to view it properly. Unlike the older, 12.1in Portege R600, the screen is not of the transreflective type, which could harness sunlight instead of using the backlight to make the screen brighter. It's just a regular LED-backlit LCD screen, albeit a very thin one (only around 7mm thick) — the move away from transreflective screens started with the Portege R700.
Also starting with the R700 was the move to full-voltage CPUs rather than ultra-low voltage models. One thing that was immediately noticeable in the R700 model we reviewed was how hot the unit's base got after being under load. Part of that was also due to the use of a 7200rpm hard drive. In the Portege R830, the heat is not as bad, and in fact it only gets slightly warm after running under a full load for a couple of hours. This is due to the use of a Second Generation (Sandy Bridge) Intel Core i5-2520M CPU and a solid state drive (a 128GB Toshiba THNSNC128GMLJ). Like most laptops though, if you use the R830 on your lap and block its vents, it will warm up a lot more (and a lot quicker) than it would if used it on a flat surface.
A fan is present to extract warm air from the chassis, and it's the only noise that emanates from the laptop. It runs very fast when the system is under a full load; it makes a whirring sound that is fairly loud and it can get annoying in a quiet room. It's louder than the ThinkPad X1, although the X1 does have a slightly wider chassis. The fan doesn't run loudly when the Portege is used to just type up documents or watch movies, and it's practically silent when the system is idle. It kicks in when you use Web pages that have Flash elements, run any games or encode media files.
Along with the Core i5-2520M CPU and solid state drive, the R830's configuration includes 4GB of DDR3 SDRAM and integrated Intel HD 3000 graphics. This configuration produced wonderful speed in our tests: in the Blender 3D rendering test is recorded a time of 40sec; in the iTunes MP3 encoding test it produced a time of 46sec; in the AutoGordianKnot test, in which we turn a DVD file into a 1.5GB Xvid file, it recorded a time of 48min. Its Blender 3D and iTunes times are exactly the same as the times recorded by the Lenovo ThinkPad X1, which also uses the Core i5-2520M CPU, but the Toshiba was one minute faster in the AutoGordianKnot test.
The Toshiba also proved to be faster in 3Dmark06, where it produced a score of 3792 — the Lenovo, using the same integrated graphics, scored 2549 in this test. The Toshiba's solid state drive did produce a slightly slower result than the solid state drive in the Lenovo, recording a transfer rate of 66.25 megabytes per second (MBps) in our tests, compared to 73.10MBps for the Lenovo. The drive is not easily replaceable as the chassis doesn't have a regular 2.5in bay with a typical SATA connection. Instead, the solid state drive has a 1.8in form factor and is connected to the motherboard via a ribbon cable.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 2 Sony Xperia XZ review: turbo-charged last-gen phone
- 3 Hisense Series 7 ULED 4K UHD TV review
- 4 Sony X9300D and X8500D UHD 4K TV review
- 5 Moto X Force review: Leading features from a mid-range phone
Latest News Articles
- Razer's revamped Blade Pro laptop marries a GeForce GTX 1080 with 4K G-Sync
- Tobii's new eye tracker adds head tracking with an emphasis on PC games
- Apple to announce new Macs at a special event October 27
- HP Omen 17 review: Great gaming performance at a great price
- Acer's swanky Swift 7 launches as the thinnest laptop ever
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: The new best Android phone
- Japan Robot, gadget and car expo slideshow
- Panasonic DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review: Best all-round TV ever?
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTProgram SchedulerNSW
- FTXamarin DeveloperQLD
- FTSenior Java ProgrammerWA
- TPJunior Project ManagerSA
- FTiOS Developer - PermanentWA
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Manufacturing ConsultantQLD
- CCContract Analyst Programmer (Windows Server) 161031/AP/962Asia
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Manufacturing ConsultantVIC
- CCNetApp ConsultantWA
- CCBackup ConsultantWA
- TPSenior Full Stack .NET Developer - AngularJSNSW
- CCDevOps EngineerNSW
- CCContract Analyst Programmer (JAVA/J2EE) 161101/AP/162Asia
- TPGIS Project ManagerVIC
- CCService Analyst (12-month contract)Asia
- CCIT Manager - ANZNSW
- CCICT Business AnalystACT
- CCContract Senior IT Assistant (Lotus Notes) 161101/SITA/571Asia
- FTJava/JEE DeveloperVIC
- CCSenior Technical Specialist SQL & Sybase DBAVIC
- FTEmbedded Software EngineerSA
- FTDelivery LeadNSW
- CCSenior Business Analyst - Telco - AgileVIC
- TPBusiness Systems AnalystQLD
- FTJava DeveloperNSW