R.U.S.E. is a real-time strategy game on PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 that has excellent presentation value, but painfully slow combat
- The virtual tabletop concept and cutscenes have a great level of presentation and production value
- Combat is very slow and the Ruse mechanic doesn't count for much -- as throwing a big army can win 95% of your matches
On paper, R.U.S.E. seems like an exciting idea: a real-time strategy game played on a virtual tabletop with realistic landscapes, infantry, tanks and airplanes, coupled with special espionage abilities called Ruses sounds like the kind of concept that strategy fanatics would kill for. But in reality, R.U.S.E. feels kind of forced and aimless, with a lot of questionable design choices that betray its potential.
Price$ 89.95 (AUD)
Setting the game in the over—trodden World War II era is probably the first misstep, as all of the locations you'll visit have been seen by anyone who's played a first—person shooter or RTS in the last ten years. Then there's the story, which focuses on an American General burdened with an overconfident counterpart whose hubris costs too many lives in battle: it's just too contrived and predictable to be enjoyable. It's a shame that the story and setting are both fairly bland, because the cut—scene work, voice acting and overall presentation in R.U.S.E. is very well done. Ubisoft should probably get the people responsible for those elements onto another, more exciting project.
The game also features a zoom mechanic that quickly goes from "fun idea" to frustratingly overused concept. Supreme Commander 1 & 2 both featured a similar mechanic, wherein pointing your cursor at a location and rolling the mouse wheel would sweep the camera in or out. What makes R.U.S.E.'s attempt at this basic RTS convention so miserable is that the map scales from life—size replicas to tabletop wargaming miniatures. If you're fielding say, ten or fifteen units, the miniatures stack onto one big largely unhelpful pile, resulting in a cluttered mess. Worse yet, the entire game is designed around this zooming mechanic so it's practically impossible to play through any single mission or skirmish without having to regularly regain your bearings after zooming.
R.U.S.E.'s battles are also frustratingly slow, with every conflict boiling down to a repetitive checklist of building a base, rolling out a big army, and fighting with the unnecessarily complicated zoom function to manage your troops. Resources accrue at a snail's pace as you wait for your supply trucks to motor their way to your HQ, and your troops move like they're slogging through a sea of goo. The molasses pacing means there's no immediacy to your battles, which is one of the key aspects of a good RTS game. I originally thought that the deliberate speed was done to accommodate console players-R.U.S.E. is also available for the Xbox 360-but I'm convinced that it's actually a side—effect of the constant need for zooming in and out of the map.
Ordering your troops around in combat isn't any easier, and the game requires you to make heavy use of key groups (binding a group of troops to a single hot key for easy selection). This is true of any RTS, but in games like StarCraft 2, key groups are a valuable strategic asset; in R.U.S.E., it's an antidote for the broken gameplay mechanics. The annoying part of this is that aircraft aren't affected as they get their own UI element on the bottom left of your screen. From here, you can build and order aircraft to attack and move from anywhere on your map. It's a functional system that should have been adapted for the ground forces as well.
Another example of an interesting feature gone awry is the Ruse mechanic. Every map is broken up into several smaller zones, which operate as areas where the espionage abilities can be employed. A Ruse can let you spy on enemy orders and enemy units or, conversely, trick your enemy by sending fake wooden units into one of these zones. Basically, they're tricky little tactics meant to keep everyone guessing what their foes are up to. The problem is that winning through Ruses doesn't seem entirely necessary. Often, I found myself attaining victory more through sheer numbers of tanks and aircraft while making minimal use of my Ruse abilities. In fact, one Ruse known as Blitz makes your units move faster, and I used it to make my supply trucks and offensive units do just that.
While the Ruse mechanic will sometimes help in a rare key moment, it still seems too easy to simply build up a large army and throw it at your enemy. Sadly, it makes most skirmishes fairly mundane, and coupled with the overused setting it quickly becomes very difficult to feel all too interested in shuffling your little units about the digital tabletop maps.
While I recognise the appeal that R.U.S.E. might hold for fans of tabletop games and the WW2 era (each nation represented in—game appear heavily researched for historical accuracy) there isn't much to get excited about. It's a poorly executed game whose key concepts are either broken or mismanaged, and definitely won't displace THQ's stellar Company of Heroes, or any other worthwhile RTS, from your hard drive.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 3 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 4 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 5 MSI GS70 laptop review
Latest News Articles
- Dead Rising 4 impressions: 'Tis the season to BBQ zombies with your flaming sword
- This week in games: Free Titanfall 2 weekend, Star Wars Battlefront meets Rogue One
- Every new game revealed at The Game Awards 2016, from Guardians of the Galaxy to Zelda
- Watch Dogs 2 PC impressions: A smooth-running romp through meme-filled San Francisco
- Hearthstone fans now have a dedicated Skype chat room to challenge its best players
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCUI DesignerNSW
- CCProject Manager - Community Transport SolutionsACT
- FTHead of User ResearchNSW
- FTSenior Network Engineer JUNIPERNSW
- CCService Desk Consultant - Must have baseline or NV1 clearanceNSW
- FTWeb Developer/ DesignerWA
- CCSecurity SpecialistVIC
- CCWindows Systems Engineer - AD, VMware, RedHat experienceNSW
- CCBusiness Analyst- RFQ, Test Manager- Government backgroundNSW
- FTBusiness Development AnalystVIC
- FTSystems Engineer - Managed Service ProviderNSW
- TPProject CoordinatorNSW
- CCInfrastructure Architect - CloudVIC
- CCProcess Analysts, Wealth ManagementNSW
- CCSenior Performance Test AnalystOther
- TPChange ManagerQLD
- CCIteration Manager / Scrum MasterOther
- CCApplication Specialist (Cerner) - Brisbane basedOther
- FTPaid Search SpecialistNSW
- CCIT Service Design Analyst- ITSMNSW
- CCService Desk/Helpdesk ConsultantNSW
- CCNight Shift Service Desk AnalystNSW
- TPProject Manager - Documentation DevelopmentQLD
- CCSystems Engineer -SOE/VDIACT
- CCBusiness AnalystQLD