Blurring the line between life and technology.
- It's the most advanced toy robot on the market (especially when it comes to believable AI behaviour)
- Price, battery life, it doesn't actually 'do' much on a surface-level
Pleo can be viewed as a major evolutionary step forward in toy robotics. Its artificial intelligence and advanced sensors make its competitors look prehistoric. However, we’re not convinced that Pleo will make for an enjoyable toy, particularly among youngsters who prefer flashy trick-laden gadgets. As such, its appeal will be limited to those who can appreciate the sophisticated AI.
Price$ 449.00 (AUD)
Pleo (Personal Life Enhancing Organism) is a robot toy with a difference. Unlike the largely superficial Robo-Sapien range, it has been designed to behave as realistically as possible, with new robotics firm Ugobe attempting to blur the line between life and technology. The result is a unique creation that can almost be compared to a living, breathing pet. But is this actually a good thing? As you will see, we remain slightly unconvinced…
For its first robotic creation, Ugobe has gone for the rather unconventional choice of a baby dinosaur, rather than the cuddlier modern-day fuzzball you might expect. Apparently, it is modelled after a one-week old Camarasaurus, an herbivorous sauropod that lived in the Jurassic Period some 150 million years ago (thanks Wikipedia). We have a sneaking suspicion this decision was made to compensate for the robot’s sluggish movement, which would otherwise seem overly slow (i.e., dinosaurs are supposed to plod).
That’s not to say Pleo isn’t cute though. With his large blinking eyes, lazy smile and purring voice box, he reminded us of a reptilian Furby doll (not coincidentally, Ugobe’s founder helped to create both products). We have no doubts that Pleo’s appearance will be a big hit with kids and kids-at-heart: it’s the kind of toy even red-blooded males will want to stroke and hug.
But Pleo is much more than a cute looking toy. With 14 servo joints, 38 inbuilt sensors (which incorporate touch, tilt, sound and light), full quadrupedal movement and a comprehensive range of behaviours and emotions, it is easily the most sophisticated toy robot yet. In fact, ‘toy’ is probably a misleading word; it would better be described as a companion or pet (or as Ugobe puts it, ‘a machine with a soul’). This is made possible by Life OS: a complex platform of interacting tools and software systems that incorporates animation, sound, ‘attention’ (which determines Pleo’s interest level in sensory objects) and ‘drive’ (which decides what choices Pleo makes based on hunger, fatigue and other organic factors). In other words, Pleo is completely independent from its owner, which means you don’t get to control him with a remote control.
Despite all this clever engineering, there is no getting past the fact that Pleo is a robot. We were reminded of this fact every time he moved, due to the constant whir of mechanical parts. The level of realism is further hampered by Pleo’s brief battery life (you need to recharge him every 90 minutes), though to be fair, he does start to act sleepy whenever its time to remove the battery which is a nice touch. On another note, the foot-mounted sensors aren't particularly adept at detecting sheer drops, which means your 'machine with a soul' will happily trundle off to his doom unless you keep an eye on him. (Mind you, the same thing can be said about most baby animals.)
Despite these misgivings, we’d say Ugobe achieved its aim in creating a plausible pet. We were particularly impressed by the believable swish of his tail. It also freaked out cat out, which probably goes to prove something, although we’re not sure what.
So what does a ‘pet robot’ do exactly? Much like a regular pet, whatever it damn well feels like! This is both a blessing and a curse. On the one hand, it helps to heighten the sense of realism, with no telltale repetition to spoil the organic illusion. One the other hand, it means Pleo rarely does what you want it to. (Even Ugobe couldn’t get it to follow its prompts during a media demonstration, and they built the damn thing.) Ironically, all this realism and unpredictability may be Pleo’s main downfall as a commercial product — much like a kitten or puppy, it mainly just stands around looking cute. By contrast, the WowWee Roboquad will break-dance to music at the press of a button. If you prefer robotic toys that do gimmicky tricks on command, you’d be better off looking elsewhere.
Our other main gripe with Pleo is the exorbitant price tag. At $449, it costs around the same amount as a Nintendo Wii console with multiple games and controllers. Whether it will offer the same level of entertainment, interactivity and longevity for you and your family is highly debatable. In conclusion, we’d have to say that Pleo is a remarkable technical achievement that fans of robotics and artificial intelligence will be highly impressed with. The average Joe, however, will simply wonder why it can’t do backflips.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
- 3 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 4 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 5 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
Latest News Articles
- Mozilla's new corporate logo evokes URL lingo
- Robot reporter gets first article published in China
- Autonomous robots are about to deliver your lunch in D.C. and Silicon Valley
- The Hub Robot will talk to your LG smart appliances
- Report: Microsoft's Home Hub will chase Amazon's Echo as a software service
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Time to ditch Foxtel and the iQ3: How to replace Foxtel packages with cheaper alternatives
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTJunior-Mid Level Implementation CoordinatorQLD
- CCICT Strategy ConsultantNSW
- CCSecurity AnalystACT
- FTLevel 2 Service DeskNSW
- FTSalesforce Technical Business AnalystQLD
- FTInformation / Data Quality AnalystNSW
- FTTSM SpecialistNSW
- CCSOA Oracle DeveloperNSW
- FTSenior Drupal DeveloperNSW
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Finance ConsultantNSW
- FTJava DeveloperNSW
- FTExecutive Sales ManagerACT
- FTSenior Linux Systems AdministratorNSW
- CCSenior Business AnalystNSW
- TPSenior Project ManagerVIC
- CCDevOps Lead - Agile/AWSVIC
- CCDigital Business Analyst l SalesforceNSW
- FTTechnology Testing Services ManagerVIC
- FTLinux EngineerNSW
- CCBusiness Project ManagerNSW
- TPSenior Business Analyst - Transformation projectsSA
- CCSAP HR/ Payroll Support ConsultantNSW
- FTNational Manager of Security - We are looking for a strong Leader - Syd CBDNSW
- FTChief ArchitectVIC
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Finance ConsultantACT