First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
Ultimate Ears Triple.Fi
Up until now we haven't reviewed a pair of in-ear-monitor's (IEM - inner ear headphones) that compares to Shure's phenomenal E500. However, the time for a successor has finally arrived. Ultimate Ears new triple driver IEM, the Triple.Fi, is an absolutely fantastic pair of headphones. It offers a different, but no less impressive sound signature than the E500s and finally provides a worthy competitor for Australian audiophiles. The only issue is with its fit, but this is extremely dependant on the individual person.
- Exquisite audio, Strong bass, Incredible detail, Great extension on highs
- Some may find it difficult to get a good seal
If you're after a high end pair of IEMs, you will be hard pressed to find better than the Ultimate Ears Triple.Fis. Their sound signature is more detailed and less bass heavy than their main competitor, the Shure E500s, but they are every bit as impressive.
Price$ 549.00 (AUD)
We had heard incredible things about the audio quality of the Triple.Fi headphones so our expectations were high. Fortunately they are everything we were hoping for and more.
The sound is extremely detailed and a lot more neutral than the E500s. We haven't heard this much detail on any other pair of IEMs we've tested. Every note and tone has its own distinct sound, separate from the rest of the music. This means the Triple.Fis are one of the most telling pairs of headphones on the market, so keep in mind, poorly recorded or encoded music will likely sound quite bad, as they will reveal the flaws much more readily than other units.
All the elements of the music are superbly rendered. Some have complained about the bass on these headphones, but as always with IEMs, it is simply a case of achieving an adequate seal with your ear canal. Once you've done this, the bass is strong and rich, extending nicely but decaying quite rapidly. The Triple.Fis certainly aren't as bass-heavy as the E500s, but they offer high quality bass that is suitable for a wide variety of music.
Meanwhile the mid-range is rich and warm, with exquisite detail and a very engrossing sound. The highs are smooth and sweeping, without any of the rolled off effect that is present on the E500s. No one element is emphasized here, meaning that these headphones are quite analytical and relatively neutral. However that doesn't make them boring. They still have the fun sound signature associated with Ultimate Ears products.
Lastly, we found the soundstage to be excellent. It is extremely encompassing with quite a grand feel for such a small pair of headphones, and while it won't quite compare to the effect of a pair of high quality over-the-head headphones, it is excellent for an IEM.
Comfort wise the Triple.Fis are quite good, although we found the E500s to be slightly more comfortable. These IEMs are quite big, thanks to the three drivers housed within and as a result they jut out from your ear quite a bit, instead of resting inside. As usual with IEMs, they slip deeply into your ear canal, which can be uncomfortable if you aren't used to it.
However, what this does do is create a seal with your ear canal, which isolates from external noise. It isn't as effective as active noise cancelling, but with your music pumping you will be hard pressed to hear anything around you. For those that get irritated by ambient noise interrupting their music, a pair of IEMs is a great choice. We found the Triple.Fi's noise cancelling to be quite good; on crowded public transport it completely blocked out any chatter, even from the seat immediately adjacent.
Our only issue with these headphones was with achieving a seal. Everybody's ear canal is a different shape, and to this end, companies usually provide a series of different tips for their IEMs, in the hope that you can tailor them to fit you as well as possible. Ultimate Ears are no exception, providing a variety of rubber and foam tips for the Triple.Fis. However, despite the multitude of options, we sometimes struggled to achieve a proper seal. This is largely a personal thing, although we have had no such issues with any other IEMs we've reviewed.
Latest News Articles
- Republicans question coverage under HealthCare.gov
- Microsoft tries to lure Gmail users with automated Outlook.com migration tool
- SAP courts developers with new license, tools, open-source contributions
- Corporate-owned smartphones back in vogue in Q3
- Dell's Chromebook 11 breaks reliance on Google's cloud
Most Popular Articles
- 1 What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- 2 Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- 3 How do I connect my TV to the Internet?
- 4 Windows 7 Home Premium vs. Windows 7 Professional
- 5 Samsung’s 2013 Smart TVs: everything you need to know
GGG Evaluation Team
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Best Deals on PCWorld
- HeadphonesView all »
- Mobile PhonesView all »
- TabletsView all »
- MP3 PlayersView all »
- Home EntertainmentView all »