- Bright screen, vivid colours
- Poor contrast ratio, narrow viewing angles, sluggish response rate
A less than adequate television for most purposes, the pitfalls of LCD technology are particularly noticeable on the N2010.
Price$ 799.00 (AUD)
LCDs have always been a slippery technology, plagued by a range of problems. Truly exceptional displays manage to avoid some or most of these problems, but in the end, LCD technology will only take a screen so far. The Viewsonic N2010, unfortunately, is not one of these displays. A fairly standard television, the N2010 suffers from a fairly standard range of problems. To its credit, it still manages to deliver impressive image quality, when not bound by the restrictions and limitations of the technology driving it.
Bright, colourful images and movies display excellently on the Viewsonic. The entire length of the twenty inch display is evenly lit, with strong, solid colours reaching to each of the four corners. Even in high light settings, the image was well defined and glare was barely noticeable. We could detect no aberrations at all, and found that colours were rendered vividly and clearly across a wide spectrum.
The only notable exception was blacks. Despite claiming what should have been a reasonable 500:1 contrast ratio, we couldn't help but find fault with the screen's ability to produce a distinct range of blacks. Dark scenes were poorly represented, a problem particularly apparent in the darkly atmospheric movie, The Crow. At several times during playback we found ourselves staring at nothing but a black screen, with one or two indistinguishable areas of dark blue, making it a less than enjoyable viewing experience.
Staying true to the natural pitfalls of its technology, the Viewsonic is marred by a noticeable colour shift at angles. While the horizontal viewing angle is more than adequate, we noticed that even a slight vertical shift resulted in a flawed image. Users are well advised to sit at eye level when viewing LCD TVs and the N2010 is no exception. An unavoidable problem, it is especially noticeable on this particular set.
Finally, a sluggish response rate makes fast moving and action-packed scenes appear blurred, with noticeable ghosting. Far from the worst example of this we've seen, the Viewsonic N2010 is nevertheless a model that is not well suited to playing action movies.
Physically, the Viewsonic looks nice enough. A crescent-shaped stand supports a silver bezel, which is flanked by two speakers, each delivering reasonable, though less than perfect sound quality. A row of basic buttons is positioned on the top of the monitor, while basic inputs on the back allow for a somewhat limited range of connections. Component is the only digital connection available, and with only two audio inputs, the N2010 is not readily suited to a position in a large scale home entertainment setup. We found the remote to be generally acceptable for operating the TV, although it was slightly unresponsive at times, and the large, rubbery buttons left a lot to be desired.
Still, despite its list of faults, the Viewsonic proves itself capable of displaying respectable image quality, in the right situations. While its faults are, in our opinion, unacceptable for general viewing, the N2010 offers an inexpensive option for users interested a big, bright screen.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
- 3 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 4 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 5 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
Latest News Articles
- Sony’s Bravia XBR-A1E OLED could be the first flat-screen TV with sound that doesn’t suck
- Say goodbye to Apple's third-generation Apple TV
- Japan gears up for 8K TV broadcasting
- NHK's latest 8K display is large, thin and beautiful
- Japan starts 8K TV broadcasts in time for Rio Olympics
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTBrand Marketing Manager - Premium Entertainment BrandNSW
- CCWebMethod DeveloperQLD
- CCAgile CoachWA
- CCAutomation TesterNSW
- FTTechnical Consultant MS Dynamics AXNSW
- CCMicrosoft Devops Engineers - contract - SydneyNSW
- CCBusiness Analyst Finance & LendingQLD
- CCJava Developer/ Guidewire DevelopersQLD
- TPIT Sercurity EngineerVIC
- FTDatacentre Solution ArchitectVIC
- CCNetwork Design EngineerACT
- CCBusiness AnalystNSW
- FTLevel 2 Service DeskNSW
- CCJava Developer/ Guidewire Developers - Brisbane basedNSW
- FTBusiness Solutions SpecialistNSW
- FTSoftware Support SpecialistQLD
- FTFunctional ConsultantNSW
- FTFront End UI DeveloperQLD
- CCFIS Connex Developer (Brisbane Based)NSW
- FTJava DeveloperSA
- CCMaster Planner /SchedulerQLD
- CCTest Automation ArchitectQLD
- TPDigital Business Analyst | AgileQLD
- FTIT Information Security AdvisorNSW