VMware Australia Fusion 1.0

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now
VMware Australia Fusion 1.0
  • VMware Australia Fusion 1.0
  • VMware Australia Fusion 1.0
  • VMware Australia Fusion 1.0
  • Expert Rating

    4.00 / 5


  • Fusion's multicore support performs really well, it's a great power user in regards to SMP and 64-bit operating systems


  • Fusion's Unity gets rid of the Windows task bar, sometimes copied images doesn't work, the P2V conversion tool doesn't come with Fusion and must be downloaded separately

Bottom Line

VMware Fusion is a solid virtualisation package for OS X that builds on VMware's long experience but offers a native Mac look and feel. Support for SMP and 64-bit operating systems make it the top choice for power users. Support for Windows is strong, but some switchers will find the sparse set of GUI-based management tools a turn-off.

Would you buy this?

The big undo command

Snapshots allow you to save a particular state of the VM, and then revert to it later. Think of it as an OS-level undo command. Snapshots are useful for backing out of an update gone badly, or for testing an application before committing to it. We use snapshots regularly when using virtual machines and have started to wish this feature were available on our standard OS. Snapshots are one of the most useful features of virtualisation.

Snapshots are also where Fusion and Parallels diverge in a significant way. Fusion's snapshot facility is fairly simple, allowing you to set a single snapshot, then return to or discard it. Parallels has a sophisticated snapshot manager that lets you keep multiple snapshots simultaneously. You can return to any of these former states and run them -- while keeping any changes you've made to the system in a new snapshot. Further, you can fork multiple changes from a single snapshot, resulting in a hierarchy of machine states that can be revisited at will.

Taking a snapshot on Fusion happens so fast we wonder if anything's happened. Parallels can take 10 seconds or so to create a snapshot. Still, that's a small penalty to pay for the piece of mind that snapshots give.

Resource requirements

One of the more important questions for anyone considering virtualisation is resource consumption. Both Parallels and Fusion allow you to easily constrain the resources that a given VM uses. Our recommendation is to accept the recommended defaults unless you have a good reason not to. In any case, you can always change these settings later.

Running virtual machines isn't for skimpy hardware. The two resources that matter most are memory and disk space. There's no way to get around the fact that virtualisation requires substantial amounts of both. We ran our tests of Parallels and Fusion on a MacBook Pro with 4GB of memory and 200GB of disk.

Each running guest takes a substantial amount of RAM, as much as several hundred megabytes. The amount of RAM in your machine will limit which other programs you can run alongside the virtual environment, what you can do on the guest, and how many guests you can run simultaneously.

Most users will have one or two guest images -- power users may have dozens. A virtual machine image consists of configuration information, a memory image, and a disk image. The disk image is the largest of these files, typically starting at a 2GB to 4GB for Windows and increasing as you install applications and add files. Both Fusion and Parallels support sparse disk images that use only as much physical space as necessary.

When you first start using virtual machines, it's interesting and helpful to keep an eye on OS X's Activity Monitor (Applications-Utilities-Activity Monitor) to monitor resource usage with different workloads. For example, we found that Parallels and Fusion both consumed 5 to 10 per cent of the CPU when running Windows XP, even when the VM was idle. With Word loaded, you will see CPU usage run as high as 20 per cent, even when you're not using the application.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?