WD Red NAS hard drive (WD30EFRX)
WD's Red drives are designed specifically with network attached storage devices in mind
- Three-year warranty
- Good performance
- Efficient performance
- High data density
- Specific spin speed not stated
WD's Red drives are good solution if you've just bought a NAS enclosure and aren't sure what types of drives you want to stick in there. They have a slightly longer warranty than desktop drives, as well as a longer stated mean time between failure, which is key for drives that will likely be on all the time.
Price$ 219.00 (AUD)
WD's Red series of hard drives is designed to be used with network attached storage (NAS) devices, rather than in desktop computers. The drives are new additions to the company's already colourful internal drive line up, which includes the Blue series (for everyday computing), the Green series (for low-power systems) and the Black series (for high-end PCs).
What makes these drives NAS-ready is their ability to run non-stop 24 hours a day, every day, and they are backed by a support plan that includes a dedicated 24-hour a day hotline in case you ever run into trouble with a drive and need advice on how to proceed.
The capacities available for the Red drives are 1TB, 2TB and 3TB and they are in a typical, 3.5in desktop drive form factor. They feature SATA III, 64MB cache and firmware called NASware that is specifically optimised for the NAS environment. WD claims that the Red drives have an increased mean time between failure (MTBF) of 35 per cent over standard desktop drives, allowing them to run all day, every day with less chance of failing than typical desktop drives under the same workloads.
They have a three-year warranty, which is one more year than the two years offered for WD's Blue and Green desktop drives, but which is two years short of the five years offered by the high-performance Black drives. It's also two years short of what WD offers with its enterprise-class drives, such as the WD RE.
We tested the WD Red drives, which are designed for small office and consumer NAS devices, in a Qnap TS-469Pro, which is a 4-bay NAS device. We had two 3TB Red drives (model WD30EFRX) at our disposal and installed them in a RAID 1 array, which would be the most common type of array for a NAS with two drives in it. The maximum formatted capacity of this array is 2.7GB as the information on the drives is duplicated for redundancy in case one drive fails.
We used a Billion BiPAC 7800VDOX modem/router with Gigabit Ethernet for our tests, and replicated those tests with a Linksys X3000 modem/router with Gigabit Ethernet for comparison, which resulted in negligible differences in performance across the board compared to the Billion router. Our test computer contained a 10000rpm Western Digital Raptor hard drive in order to facilitate fast transfers to and from the NAS device across the network.
During operation, the WD Red array consumed a maximum of 35W of power when performing reading and writing tasks, which makes them quite economical. The spin speed of the Red drives is not specifically stated. Instead, WD lists the revolutions per minute of the drives as "IntelliPower", which suggests that the motor spins at an undisclosed rate specific to the drive, but at a lower rate than a typical 7200rpm hard drive. Basically, it's a specification that's designed to reduce power consumption, yet still provide adequate performance.
Compared to two 1TB Seagate Constellation ES drives (model ST31000524NS) that we tested in the same NAS device in a RAID 1 array and running the same tests, the WD Red drives were four Watts more efficient while operating, and two Watts more efficient while idle. That's not an entirely fair comparison though, as the Seagate drives have a lower data density and are designed for the enterprise, not just for consumer and small business NAS devices. However, it gives an indication as to what the Red drives can do against more robust drives in the same platform.
The overall performance of the Red drives, despite the more economical power consumption, compared favourably to the Seagate drives. In fact, for large file transfers, the numbers were almost identical. The WD Red array wrote large files at a rate of 51.32 megabytes per second (MBps) — the exact same rate that the Seagate array recorded — and it read large files at a rate of 90.62MBps — a little lower than the 92.06MBps rate of the Seagate array. Small files (think MP3s and JPEG photos) were written by the Red drives at 49.31MBps — faster than the Seagate drives' 48.22MBps — but read at 62MBps — slower than the Seagate drives' 70MBps.
The Red drives are good and if you are building a NAS array you should consider them over regular desktop drives due to their slightly longer warranty and stated always-on reliability. Retail pricing for a 3TB Red drive is $219, which works out to be about seven cents per formatted gigabyte, and only a little bit more than a 3TB Green drive according to street pricing we saw at the time of writing.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Everki ContemPRO Roll Top Laptop Backpack
Epson WorkForce ET-4550
Samsung portable 1TB T3 drive
Epson EcoTank Expression ET-2500
Microsoft L5V-00027 Sculpt Ergonomic Keyboard Desktop
Smart LED Bulb LB130
Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive
UE Boom 2 Bluetooth speaker
Epson WorkForce DS-360W
3SIXT Ultra HD Sports Action Camera
Acer Swift 7
Google Daydream VR headset
Logitech G403 Prodigy mouse
Huawei Mate 9
Belkin MIXIT Metallic Lightning to USB Cable
Lexar® JumpDrive® S45 USB 3.0 flash drive
Lexar® Portable SSD
Lexar® Professional 1800x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards
Blade 28 backpack by Arc’teryx
HP Pavilion x360 13”
Dell Inspiron 5000 series 2-in-1
Audio-Technica ATH-ANC70 Noise Cancelling Headphones
Lexar® JumpDrive® C20c USB Type-C flash drive
Dell XPS 13 laptop
Surface Pro 4
Garmin Fenix Chronos smartwatch
HD Pan/Tilt Wi-Fi Camera with Night Vision NC450
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo R9s Plus phone: Full, in-depth review
- 2 Samsung 2017 QLED Q7 TV: Full, in-depth review
- 3 HTC U Ultra phone full, in-depth review
- 4 Gigabyte Aorus GA-AX370-Gaming 5 AMD Ryzen AM4 motherboard review
- 5 Kogan curved 4K UHD 55-inch LED LCD TV review
Latest News Articles
- New, colourful LaCie Rugged Thunderbolt USB-C was designed by Neil Poulton
- Western Digital begins production of the world's tallest 3D NAND 'skyscraper'
- WD will make a record-breaking 14TB hard drive available next year
- Start hoarding SSDs: Prices are expected to spike as supply gets tight
- Intel's silence on Optane SSDs raises questions about launch and focus
PCW Evaluation Team
A smarter way to print for busy small business owners, combining speedy printing with scanning and copying, making it easier to produce high quality documents and images at a touch of a button.
I've had a multifunction printer in the office going on 10 years now. It was a neat bit of kit back in the day -- print, copy, scan, fax -- when printing over WiFi felt a bit like magic. It’s seen better days though and an upgrade’s well overdue. This HP OfficeJet Pro 8730 looks like it ticks all the same boxes: print, copy, scan, and fax. (Really? Does anyone fax anything any more? I guess it's good to know the facility’s there, just in case.) Printing over WiFi is more-or- less standard these days.
As a freelance writer who is always on the go, I like my technology to be both efficient and effective so I can do my job well. The HP OfficeJet Pro 8730 Inkjet Printer ticks all the boxes in terms of form factor, performance and user interface.
I’d happily recommend this touchscreen laptop and Windows 10 as a great way to get serious work done at a desk or on the road.
Ultimately, I think the Windows 10 environment is excellent for me as it caters for so many different uses. The inclusion of the Xbox app is also great for when you need some downtime too!
For me, the Xbox Play Anywhere is a great new feature as it allows you to play your current Xbox games with higher resolutions and better graphics without forking out extra cash for another copy. Although available titles are still scarce, but I’m sure it will grow in time.
- Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 phone: Full, in-depth review
- LG G6: unboxing, hands on review and detail shots
- And the 2017 winner of the Formula 1 Best Pit Lane Boom Gantry is...
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTSocial Media ExecutiveNSW
- CCApplication Support Specialist- Bathurst or Port MacquarieNSW
- FTTest SpecialistSA
- CCLevel 1 IT Support OfficerACT
- FTSenior Technical Consultant - Microsoft / VMWareVIC
- FTNetwork EngineerACT
- FTUX DesignerNSW
- TP.Net Software DeveloperQLD
- TPSenior Project ManagerVIC
- FTEnterprise ArchitectQLD
- FTAgile CoachACT
- FTInfrastructure ArchitectVIC
- TPProject Support Officer - Data and Information ManagementVIC
- FTSenior Business Analysis - FinanceQLD
- FTJava Developer - Short team Contract @ CanberraNSW
- TPJunior Software DeveloperQLD
- FTService Desk AnalystsSA
- FTBillings Integration ArchitectVIC
- CCWeb Devops EngineerNSW
- TPSenior Test AnalystQLD
- FTPHP DeveloperNSW
- CCOracle WebLogic AdministratorNSW
- FTSenior Performance AnalystQLD
- FTTechnical Solutions ArchitectWA
- TPTest AnalystNSW