Distributed denial of service attacks (DDoS) attempt to make a machine or network resource unavailable to its intended users, with a wave of crippling attacks on enterprises since 2012. This whitepaper offers guidance to security and network architects in designing, deploying, and managing architecture to protect against increasingly sophisticated, application-layer DDoS attacks.
This whitepaper is the third in a three-part series on distributed denial of service attacks (DDoS) and multi-tier DDoS protection. This section refers to case studies of different approaches to deploying protection architecture, including an enterprise customer scenario, an FSI customer scenario and an SMB customer scenario. The paper explains how these options should provide the flexibility and needed to combat the modern DDoS threat.
This whitepaper is the second in a three-part series on distributed denial of service attacks (DDoS) and multi-tier DDoS protection. This section details the design and capabilities of different forms of protection architecture designed for a variety of circumstances, while also providing alternative approaches. The paper also explains how to maintain availability, including network and application defense and DNS DDoS Mitigation.
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 3 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 4 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 5 MSI GS70 laptop review
Join the PC World newsletter!
Latest News Articles
- Twitter gets new product head and team from app startup Yes
- Amazon will literally truck your data into its cloud
- New supercomputer will unite x86, Power9 and ARM chips
- AWS comes out swinging with A.I. services
- How Trump will attack the FCC's net neutrality rules
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTSenior Network EngineerSA
- TPChange ManagerQLD
- CCFunctional Consultant - Brisbane locationVIC
- FTAngular DeveloperSA
- CCTechnical Solutions Architect - CloudNSW
- FTDeployment Project EngineerVIC
- FTProject ManagerOther
- CCMaximo Consultant - Asset ManagementVIC
- FTDesktop Deployment EngineerWA
- FTServer Infrastructure Team LeaderACT
- CCSenior Integration DeveloperNSW
- CCWeb Developer - WordpressNSW
- FTSenior Back-end Developer/Database DesignerSA
- CCLotus Notes DeveloperNSW
- TPIT Document Writer And TrainerVIC
- CCTechnical Application Specialist (Cerner)QLD
- FTAPI Design LeadVIC
- FTCloud Automation EngineerSA
- CCData Quality AnalystNSW
- CCAutomation TesterNSW
- FTDigital Delivery and Engagement OfficersVIC
- FTNetwork EngineerVIC
- FTSenior Business Analyst -permanent opportunityVIC
- TPProjects Planning ManagerQLD
- TPSharePoint ConsultantNSW