Dell's dicey fortune

Investors and the SEC are going after Dell, but it shouldn’t have to take the rap alone

I wrote a column in 2005 called "How will Dell Offset the Loss of Intel's Generosity? ". In it, I asserted that Dell needed to overhaul its strategy and focus to make up for the coming loss of Intel's ... oh, call it what you like: price supports, subsidies, loyalty bonuses, or what the business calls MDF (market development funds).

Dell detailed a services and consulting strategy for me that would be a bulwark against falling margins and the rising cost of stateside manufacturing. It made sense, but nothing came of it. Instead, at the time I wrote the column, Dell was on a binge, drinking ever deeper of a well that Intel made sure never ran dry.

Dell drank so deeply that, as investors who filed suit against Dell allege, it relied on Intel's rebates and loyalty ("don't do business with AMD") payments to keep its No. 1 ranking. Top dog was a position that not only looked great for Dell, it also gave Intel its last ammunition against AMD: Dell was proof that customers didn't care about CPU choice. How could Dell's stock climb so fast if AMD's claim -- that customers craved choice -- held any water? Keeping that question front of mind for the market was vital to Intel and Dell, and it kept AMD in its place.

I have a theory about a wrinkle that made Dell's crash so dramatic. Several times in the period following AMD's rollout of Opteron, Dell executives spoke to InfoWorld and other media outlets to hint that Dell was considering buying AMD chips. Every time Dell said that, it was front-page news, and no doubt topped the agenda at Intel the following day. It seems to me that as AMD's CPUs gained visibility and market share, Dell played Intel for an escalation of what suing investors call kickbacks. Dell probably didn't need to ask for a raise. It just dropped the A-bomb periodically and Intel said "How much this time?"

In any case, Dell's shareholders are most unhappy that in September 2006, a few short months after Dell signed with AMD, Dell's executives started dumping their stock to the tune of US$3.3 billion. Might they have foreseen that the withdrawal of Intel's kickbacks was about to blow a hole in Dell's balance sheet? That was obvious to me in 2005, and I've never seen the inside of a boardroom.

Kevin Rollins, who reigned over the AMD affair, has given up the CEO spot to Michael Dell. Maybe Rollins is being set up as sacrificial lamb. Mr. Dell may be displeased that Mr. Rollins' brilliant strategy in the face of SEC and New York Attorney General investigations was to let the filing of two quarters' worth of earnings reports slip his mind.

This doesn't call for financial prestidigitation or a deal for a $10 million fine and time served. It calls for the truth, and the laying of responsibility where it belongs. Intel's "business as usual" is not business as it should be. Dell isn't blameless, but it got stuck in a web spun by Intel. The best way for Dell to make amends is to lay out, for all of us, just how "business as usual" is done. This time, it should remember not to leave anything out.

One final note: In last week's column I referred to AMD's Torrenza as CPU technology. Torrenza is a specification for linking third-party coprocessors and other programmable logic directly to AMD CPUs through their HyperTransport busses. I just can't keep code names straight. Sorry about that.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Tom Yager

InfoWorld
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?