Does .Net have a dynamic-language deficiency?

Dynamic programming languages have been around for decades. With LISP (LISt Processing) and Smalltalk as progenitors, today's popular examples include Perl, Python, and Ruby.

Often labeled "open source scripting languages" and regarded as useful mainly for data mining and automated system administration, their well-kept secret is that these highly-productive languages power more mission-critical services than enterprises like to admit. In the Java world, a Java/Python hybrid called Jython has built a cult following among developers who want to manipulate Java APIs with the ease and flexibility of Python.

The .Net world lacks a Jython equivalent. ActiveState's Perl .Net and Zope Corporation's Python for .Net bridge these languages' VMs (virtual machines) to the .Net CLR (Common Language Runtime). But they don't achieve the deep integration that comes from implementing a language directly on the CLR, as Jython implements Python on the JVM.

Despite lots of second-guessing, there's no consensus that the CLR is inherently unfriendly to dynamic languages. The JVM doesn't bend over backwards for such languages either, and yet Jython is a great success thanks to the heroic efforts of its inventor, Jim Hugunin. Now Hugunin has turned his attention to .Net, and reports promising results with a prototype Python implementation for .Net called IronPython.

Such projects always seem to spring from an inspired individual or small team. In fact, Microsoft Corp. has such a team. It created JScript .Net, the most dynamic of Microsoft's .Net languages. But JScript .Net is the unloved stepsister of C# and Virtual Basic .Net.

Dynamic languages are rooted in a culture that is simply not indigenous to Redmond. That may change, but for the time being, the future of dynamic languages in .Net lies with non-Microsoft innovators.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jon Udell

Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

David Coyle

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.

Kurt Hegetschweiler

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

It’s perfect for mobile workers. Just take it out — it’s small enough to sit anywhere — turn it on, load a sheet of paper, and start printing.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?