Microsoft Expects to Beat Breakup

The software company is seeking a stay of the judge's order to submit a divestiture plan within four months and make certain immediate behavioral changes.

"We will submit a stay of the order so that the appeal can move forward without any harm to Microsoft or consumers," says Bill Gates, Microsoft's founder and chair.

After two years of legal wrangling, Federal District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson on Wednesday ordered Microsoft broken into two companies to protect consumers and the computer industry from future misuse of its monopoly power. One company will market the Windows operating system technology, and the other will oversee Microsoft's applications business, including its Internet services. The Windows company could not develop or market the Internet Explorer browser.

Also, the two companies could not enter into any joint ventures, or license technology at better terms than they give other vendors.

Jackson also imposed behavioral restrictions while the breakup plan is being worked out, notably protecting vendors who market competing products. Microsoft must give all PC manufacturers the same Windows licensing terms, and let them promote non-Microsoft products on their desktops. It must also give competing software vendors the same technical information it gives its own applications developers. Also, Microsoft would have to offer a version of Windows that does not integrate IE.

Jackson also provided protection for those in the high-tech industry who testified against Microsoft during the two-year trial.

Executives Confident

Microsoft reacted to the ruling with confidence that the decision will be overturned. By immediately appealing, Microsoft can avoid having to release source code to competitors and follow other policies the executives find distasteful.

"Today's ruling represents an unwarranted and unjust intrusion into the software marketplace," Gates says. "It really flies in the face of the development of the kind of products that have benefited customers."

Microsoft contends that it is procompetitive and that it bundled IE with Windows to benefit consumers. "It was not to exclude Netscape or any other competitor from distributing or enhancing their product," Gates notes.

Microsoft says it used the success of its operating system to allow it to offer new technologies to consumers at low costs and thereby drive the PC industry as a whole.

This case is an attempt to change those rules, which allow people to innovate, Gates contends.

Development Plans Unchanged

Having to share source code, as Jackson orders, will deter software development, Microsoft executives say.

"We are to disclose our most valuable intellectual property even to our competitors," says Bill Neukom, Microsoft executive vice president for law and corporate affairs. "And we're to design the operating system to the vague specifications of the government."

Sure that it will succeed on appeal, Microsoft plans to forge ahead with Next Generation Windows Services. But "we need to keep our team together," Gates says.

"We have exciting plans for that team, including a breakthrough interface that involves handwriting and speech recognition," Gates says.

In a brief reflection on the courtroom conduct, Gates suggested that "perhaps I should have taken the time to go in personally and talk about this industry." His videotaped courtroom testimony came off alternately as insincere and stilted.

Gates and other Microsoft executives complain that they weren't permitted to offer evidence during the remedy phase of the trial, to dispute claims by the plaintiffs in their recommendations.

But Gates hastened to recognize the court's authority.

"While we disagree with the government on this, I want to make it clear we respect the role of government and our legal and justice system, and we will abide with any final ruling in this case," Gates adds.

Justice Department Jubilant, Some Vendors Pleased The Justice Department praised Jackson's final judgment, saying the breakup and accompanying restrictions will foster competition and innovation in the high-tech world.

The elimination of Microsoft business practices that the Justice Department and Jackson deemed unfair will be a boon to the industry, says Joel Klein, assistant attorney general and head of the Justice Department's antitrust division.

"You play ball with us, you get a low price. You carry our competitors' products, you get a high price. That would be prohibited," Klein said at a news conference.

The Software & Information Industry Association also gave a nod to the ruling. The industry organization had submitted a brief suggesting Microsoft be divested into three parts, with a separate company handling Internet services.

"In terms of innovation, Judge Jackson's ruling will allow consumers to benefit from technological advances developed by any independent software publisher in the world, not just those developed by Microsoft or at the acceptance of Microsoft," says Ken Wasch, SIIA president.

No Breakup, Says Microsoft

Microsoft executives have repeatedly emphasized that a breakup would create two companies unable to compete in the technology market. Its most recent filing repeats the claim that a breakup would cause "severe harm" to computer manufacturers, software developers, and others in the industry. Microsoft contends that the Justice Department's proposals contain "numerous flaws" that the government attorneys have not addressed.

In particular, Microsoft objects to the government's request for what Microsoft calls "a wholesale transfer of proprietary information" about Windows to competitors, and says the restrictions limit what features the software company can build into products.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Staff Writers

PC World
Show Comments



Sansai 6-Outlet Power Board + 4-Port USB Charging Station

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?