Microsoft loosening contracts for PC makers

Amid mounting pressure from competition regulators, Microsoft will scrap a clause in its licensing contracts with PC manufacturers that prevents them from enforcing any hardware patents they have that may have implications for software.

The so-called non-assert clause will be removed from all licensing agreement renewals for the Windows operating system from August of this year, Microsoft spokesperson, Tom Brookes, said.

"We recently reviewed this provision again after receiving comments on it from some of our original equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers and have decided to delete the provision in its entirety from the next round of OEM contracts," Brookes said.

He denied that simultaneous investigations of Microsoft by Japanese and European competition regulators led the software firm to scrap the clause.

"It's coincidental," he said.

Last October, the European Commission wrote to 22 OEMs asking them about the clause.

Ten days ago, the Japan Fair Trade Commission raided Microsoft offices in Tokyo in a similar inquiry.

Regulators in both countries suspect that Microsoft may be abusing the dominance of Windows.

Hardware manufacturers such as IBM, Dell, Hitachi and Toshiba had signed the non-assert clauses because they could not afford to offer computers without Windows, said Thomas Vinje, an outspoken critic of Microsoft and a partner in the Brussels office of the law firm Clifford Chance.

The clause acted as a big disincentive for OEMs to innovate, said Vinje, whose clients include Dell and Fujitsu. For example, if IBM patented a method for speeding up the operations of a computer, the company would not be able to enforce that patent in order to prevent Microsoft or any other competing hardware manufacturer from using the technology.

"The Commission has looked at these clauses in the past but it has never issued a ruling," he said.

In 2001 the Commission closed an investigation of the non-assert clause after Microsoft reached a settlement with an unnamed British OEM that sparked the investigation by complaining to the European competition regulator.

"We briefly looked into the patent-related clause as a result of a complaint in 2000 by a company that had a patent-related dispute in the United States, but did not pursue the case as it was settled between the companies concerned," Commission spokesperson Amelia Torres said.

The Commission's inquiry into Microsoft Windows licensing agreements with hardware manufacturers could still form the basis of a separate antitrust investigation, even if the non-assert clause is scrapped later this year.

The letters to the 22 OEMs also asks them about clauses in their contracts with Microsoft that the Commission suspects are designed to create obstacles to open source software.

"There are several provisions in the contracts that are designed to act as road blocks to open source software running on PCs," Vinje said. "The Commission also asked about these."

There is no timeframe for the Commission's investigation.

The inquiry is separate from an ongoing antitrust lawsuit conducted by the Commission. The antitrust case focuses on Microsoft's policy of bundling its audio-video Media Player software into successive versions of Windows.

The European Commission has accused Microsoft of abusing the dominant position of Windows in order to foreclose the market for multimedia software. The Commission also accuses the US software giant of leveraging its dominance of PC-operating system software into the market for low-end server operating systems.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Paul Meller

IDG News Service
Show Comments


James Cook University - Master of Data Science Online Course

Learn more >




Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?