Domain Names clash on court ruling

Domain Names Australia (DNA) is pressing ahead with its appeal against the Federal Court forbidding its marketing practices.

It claims other Federal Court judges have criticised the ruling.

Justice Finkelstein found that DNA's marketing breached Section 52 of the Trade Practices Act by misleading significant numbers of people into sending it money in order to keep their websites.

The case against DNA had revolved around its practise of sending out material that looked like invoices and conveyed the impression that their website registrations would be cancelled if they did not pay $237 by a certain date.

However, DNA last week released a statement saying that in another Federal Court decision on April 22, relating to a share offer by National Exchange, Justices Jacobson and Bennett indicated that they disagreed with Justice Finkelstein's view that it was not necessary to establish that many people were misled.

Last month, Justice Finkelstein dismissed several applications brought by auDA and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission against DNA, a Perth-based domain name retailer, but upheld three relating to the wording of marketing material.

Chris Disspain, CEO of auDA, the .au domain names administrator, rejects the view that Justice Finkelstein's ruling has been criticised. Disspain said such an interpretation of the Jacobson and Bennett ruling was wrong.

Domain Names Australia director, Chesley Rafferty, said that Justice Finkelstein's ruling applied only to marketing material sent to companies with existing domain names. This made up only a small percentage of Domain Names Australia's business.

"Most of our marketing material targets companies with no existing web presence and could not therefore be regarded as misleading within the meaning of this ruling," Rafferty said.

Disspain said that following the appeal, DNA would face a class-action lawsuit.

The auDA would use the courts to secure refunds for people who sent money to DNA after receiving its marketing, he said. Nonetheless, DNA said it had modified its marketing practices to comply with the Federal Court ruling, pending the appeal, set for August.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

David Coyle

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.

Kurt Hegetschweiler

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

It’s perfect for mobile workers. Just take it out — it’s small enough to sit anywhere — turn it on, load a sheet of paper, and start printing.

Matthew Stivala

HP OfficeJet 250 Mobile Printer

The HP OfficeJet 250 Mobile Printer is a great device that fits perfectly into my fast paced and mobile lifestyle. My first impression of the printer itself was how incredibly compact and sleek the device was.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?