Microsoft warns customers about exploits for new flaws

Microsoft warned about exploits for two critical software holes it patched on Tuesday and blamed security companies for publishing proof of concept code.

Microsoft warned customers about computer code that exploits holes in the company's software and blamed security researchers for publishing proof of concept code to trigger the vulnerabilities, which was then turned into working attacks.

The company issued a statement on its Web site last Thursday citing an increased risk to users of its Windows operating system MSN Messenger instant messenger (IM) application and Office XP software suite. Microsoft singled out Finjan Software and Core Security Technologies for publishing code to test for the vulnerabilities shortly after software patches were released to plug the holes.

Finjan released code to test for a hole its researchers discovered in Microsoft Office XP, and that Microsoft fixed with a patch described in Security Bulletin MS05-005. Finjan, a San Jose, California, maker of content management technology, discovered and then publicized code to test for the vulnerability on the same day Microsoft released its bulletin, Microsoft said.

The buffer overflow in question affects a process that passes Web URL (Uniform Resource Locator) information to Office XP applications and could be used by malicious hackers to hide attacks in HTML (Hypertext Markup Language) links embedded in e-mail messages or Web pages. (See:

Microsoft also criticized Core Security Technologies of Boston for publishing a proof of concept for a hole in an MSN Messenger component called "libpng," which is used to display PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files. On Tuesday, Microsoft released a patch, MS05-009, that fixed several holes in libpng for the PNG hole and labeled the vulnerability "critical." (See: An exploit based on that proof of concept was posted on the Internet shortly thereafter, Microsoft said.

The actions by Finjan and Core could allow malicious hackers to launch attacks on Microsoft customers who have not had time to install patches for the affected software, said Stephen Toulouse, program manager at Microsoft's Security Response Center.

"We're concerned that hackers will take this information and use it. Once you have code that describes how to get from A to B to C, it's not hard to get to Z if that's your goal," he said.

Toulouse cited the SQL Slammer worm, which targeted Microsoft's SQL Server database as an example of proof of concept code that was modified to create a virulent Internet worm.

Microsoft encourages security researchers to wait before publishing the code, Toulouse said, adding that 90 days is an accepted standard within the security research community to delay publication of proof of concept code.

An executive at Core Security denied that the company had done anything wrong, saying that publishing proof of concept code for security vulnerabilities is part of his company's job.

"We develop proof of concept code for people to test for a vulnerability, not to give an attacker control of a (computer)," said Max Caceres, director of product management at Core Security.

He said there are many ways that exploit writers could develop code to trigger a vulnerability and he is not sure that his company's proof of concept played any role in the release of the PNG exploit.

"As soon as any vendor releases a patch to the world, it's a clear map to a vulnerability," he said.

Toulouse said that proof of concept code helps exploit writers and malicious hackers more than innocent customers.

"In my thinking, (proof of concept code) benefits attackers more than anyone else. ... We try to give enough information to allow customers to assess the threat to their network, without crossing the line into giving details that attackers can use to leverage that (vulnerability)," he said.

Microsoft will continue to work with third-party security researchers to encourage responsible practices for disclosing security vulnerabilities. The company is also on the lookout for automated attacks, such as worms and viruses, that use some of the recently released exploits, Toulouse said.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Paul Roberts

IDG News Service
Show Comments


James Cook University - Master of Data Science Online Course

Learn more >


Sansai 6-Outlet Power Board + 4-Port USB Charging Station

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?