Complexity stifles Web services

Although deployments are occurring, a morass of complexity and a long, head-spinning list of proposed standards continues to hobble Web services technology, according to participants at an SDForum interoperability event.

Citing issues ranging from competing standards to a lack of end-user participation in standards development, speakers gave mostly a poor progress report on the interoperability technology.

Speakers were featured at the SDForum's event entitled, Interoperability Forum -- An Open Industry Dialog.

"My personal observation, living in this world, [is that] it's still the early days of Web services," a partner in the technology integration services unit at Deloitte, Andy Daecher, said.

Displaying a list of about 15 Web services specifications currently vying to become standards, analyst vice-president and research director at the Burton Group, Anne Thomas Manes, referred to the confusing situation as vertigo.

The list featured specifications such as WS-Federation and Business process Execution Language (BPEL).

"I understand what all this stuff is and it still makes my head spin," she said.

While the Web Services Interoperability Organisation Basic Profile provides some understanding of how to use these specifications, there were unresolved issues, such as in using XML data mappings, Manes said.

Attachments also pose problems with interoperability, she said.

Java supported Multimedia Internet Mail Extensions (MIKE) while .Net supported Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME), Manes said. "You can't make them work together," she said.

Migrating from Web Services Framework (WSF) 1.0 to WSF 2.0 would be disruptive, Manes said.

Situations also have emerged with competing standards proposals, such as WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-Reliability, although WS-ReliableMessaging had won that battle, she said.

WS-Notification and WS-Eventing also were competing proposals, she said.

BPEL and WS-CDL presented yet another competitive situation, Manes said.

Typically, vendors, not users, were pushing standards, she said.

"The vendors are always pursuing their own agenda [and not necessarily customer requirements]," Manes said.

While noting the plethora of standard proposals for users to follow, she did stress the importance of standards.

"Just to conclude, interoperability is your goal," Manes said. "You need to get your systems to work together and standards [are] definitely the solution. Unfortunately, standardisation takes time."

Initiatives were under way to make it simpler to program with Web services, vice-president of Architecture and Standards at BEA Systems, Edward Cobb, said.

"That has been one of the major inhibitors," he said. "You really do need to b a rocket scientist to use a lot of it."

An audience member concurred with Cobb's assessment and said that interoperability between Java and .Net took a substantial amount of work.

Cobb said there was a place for tools that made it easier to use Web services.

Efforts to this effect were under way at the Eclipse Foundation, he said. But tooling alone would not suffice.

"The thing we have to be a little careful about is that we need abstractions that don't assume that you can cover up complexity with tooling," Cobb said.

Sun technology director, Nicholas Kassem, said there was no single way to bootstrap Web services that would be relevant to everybody. "There is no single magic bullet," Kassem said.

Another audience member expressed concern that investments in Web services technology could become irrelevant because of changing standards.

Forum Systems President/CEO Weston Swenson said his company used gateways to enable customers to interoperate with standards.

Despite all the discouraging comments among panelists, Cobb said that Web services standards did work.

"The original question is, are the standards mature enough to work? The answer is [absolutely] yes," he said.

But more needed to be done to bring about wider use of Web services, Cobb said.

The industry must enable the great majority of IT users to be able to use Web services - not just leading edge companies, consultants and some others, he said.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Paul Krill

Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

David Coyle

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.

Kurt Hegetschweiler

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

It’s perfect for mobile workers. Just take it out — it’s small enough to sit anywhere — turn it on, load a sheet of paper, and start printing.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?