Judge rules PlayStation copyright case will go on

A US district judge has denied Sony's motion to dismiss the copyright infringement case filed against it by Immersion and related to the PlayStation line.

Sony Computer Entertainment executives are pledging to appeal a judge's ruling that the company violated copyright law in the design of its popular PlayStation.

If the company loses that appeal, it will have to pay a US$90 million fine and buy a license for the technology, or else stop selling the console, a force feedback control and some game titles.

U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken last week denied Sony's effort to dismiss the entire case, when she ruled that Sony had paid an "unreliable" witness US$150,000 to give testimony that he had invented the technology first.

The lawsuit began in February 2002 when Immersion sued Microsoft and Sony for violating its copyright on handheld game controls that vibrate in time with action on the screen.

"Sony was trying to convince the judge there was newfound evidence to open the case back up and remand it to district court, on the grounds there was fraud committed by Immersion. The judge has now denied that claim," said Victor Viegas, president and chief executive officer of Immersion, which is based in California.

A Sony spokeswoman said she could not comment on an ongoing court case.

The engineering term for tactile force feedback is haptic technology, and it is used in products such as medical training simulators, mobile phones and automotive and industrial controls. Immersion licenses the technology to companies, including cell-phone maker Samsung Electronics and vehicle manufacturers BMW Group, DaimlerChrysler, Rolls Royce and Volkswagen.

Haptic feedback is also crucial for adding a true sensory dimension to the simulated action of video games. Game platforms that use a licensed version of Immersion's technology in their joysticks or steering wheels include Apple Computer and Nintendo.

Sony used haptic technology in its Dual Shock controller, released for the 1998 version of its PlayStation product. It has also used the technology for subsequent versions, including PlayStation 2 and the pending PlayStation 3, as well as on 44 published games for those platforms.

In July 2003, Microsoft agreed to an out-of-court settlement of Immersion's patent infringement case, allowing it to use haptic technology in its Xbox video game platform. But instead of joining Microsoft in a settlement, Sony decided to fight Immersion in court. That strategy has gone poorly for the company so far, according to court documents and a time line provided by Immersion.

"We have had only four lawsuits in the history of the company, and three of the four have signed license agreements. The fourth is Sony," Viegas said.

In September 2004, a jury awarded Immersion US$82 million in damages following a trial in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in Oakland. That amount later rose to US$90 million to include court costs.

In March 2005, Judge Wilken banned Sony from selling any infringing product, including the consoles, Dual Shock controllers and the specific games for every version of PlayStation. She froze that injunction pending Sony's appeal.

The latest chapter began in July 2005, when Sony filed a separate motion to throw the case out of court, citing new evidence that Immersion had concealed copyright drawings by an inventor named Craig Thorner. That motion was denied last Wednesday, with Judge Wilken calling Thorner an unreliable witness whose court testimony had been swayed by a payment of US$150,000 from Sony.

Sony's appeal of the original judgment remains outstanding.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Ben Ames

IDG News Service
Show Comments


James Cook University - Master of Data Science Online Course

Learn more >


Victorinox Werks Professional Executive 17 Laptop Case

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Bitdefender 2018

Roam freely in the digital world. Critically acclaimed performance and security at your fingertips.

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?