Judge: Google must provide index data to government

A court has ordered Google to comply in part with a government subpoena, by providing data from its search engine index.

In a highly anticipated decision, a federal judge ruled Friday that Google has to provide the U.S. government with information about its search engine's index. The case highlights the tension between online user privacy and law-enforcement needs.

Judge James Ware, of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, wrote in his decision that Google must provide the government with 50,000 Web addresses in its search engine index.

Google should "confer" with the government to develop a protocol to randomly select and provide the URLs from its index, but to comply with this order Google doesn't have to disclose proprietary information about its Web site address database, the judge wrote.

Moreover, the government needs to pay Google for the cost of producing this data, and the data will be kept under wraps by the court's order.

Finally, the government's request for a sample of search queries filed by Google users was denied.

"This is a clear victory for our users. The subpoena has been drastically limited; most importantly the order excludes search queries," said Nicole Wong, Google's associate general counsel, in a statement Friday.

In January, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion asking the court to force Google to comply with a subpoena seeking usage and index data from its search engine.

During a hearing on Tuesday, March 12, Judge Ware said he was leaning toward requiring Google to turn over at least some of the search engine usage records the DOJ wanted.

At that hearing, DOJ attorneys disclosed that the government had significantly shrunk the scope of its original request to 50,000 URLs (uniform resource locators) and 5,000 search queries.

In its subpoena, served last year, the government asked for a random sample of 1 million Web site addresses from Google's search engine index and for the text of all queries filed during a specific week.

Google refused to comply with the subpoena, citing, among other things, concern over its users' privacy. The government has contended throughout that it isn't interested in any data that would identify individual users.

Google also cited concerns that complying would compromise trade secrets and would place an "undue burden" on the company, objections the government characterized as groundless.

This action against Google is part of a broader attempt by the DOJ to defend the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) law, whose constitutionality has so far been successfully challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in an ongoing litigation.

COPA, which the ACLU argues violates the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment right to freedom of speech, will again be debated in court in October. To bolster its case, the DOJ subpoenaed search engine records from Google, Yahoo, America Online and Microsoft's MSN division. All but Google complied to some extent with the request.

The government says it needs this search engine data to prove that legislation in the form of COPA is a more effective tool than filtering software in protecting minors from pornographic material on the Internet.

The Pennsylvania district court in which the COPA lawsuit was filed granted the ACLU's motion for preliminary injunction, and an appeals court affirmed it in 2000.

The case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which vacated the judgment of the appeals court and sent it back to that court, which in turn again affirmed the preliminary injunction. The Supreme Court again reviewed the case, but that time it affirmed the preliminary injunction and sent the case back for trial.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Juan Carlos Perez

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

David Coyle

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.

Kurt Hegetschweiler

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

It’s perfect for mobile workers. Just take it out — it’s small enough to sit anywhere — turn it on, load a sheet of paper, and start printing.

Matthew Stivala

HP OfficeJet 250 Mobile Printer

The HP OfficeJet 250 Mobile Printer is a great device that fits perfectly into my fast paced and mobile lifestyle. My first impression of the printer itself was how incredibly compact and sleek the device was.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?