Google antifraud efforts OK, study says

A New York University computer scientist says Google is making a "reasonable" effort to combat click fraud.

Google is making a "reasonable" effort to fight click fraud, according to a report written by a New York University computer science expert.

Google commissioned the 47-page report as part of a class action lawsuit settlement reached last March, according to Shuman Ghosemajumder, a business product manager with Google. The report was written by Alexander Tuzhilin, a professor of information systems at New York University.

"We agreed with the plaintiffs to have an independent expert examine our detection methods, policies, practices, and procedures and make a determination of whether or not we had implemented reasonable measures to protect all of our advertisers," Ghosemajumder wrote Friday on Google's official blog. His post can be found here: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/07/findings-on-invalid-clicks.html

Google and several other pay-per-click providers, including Yahoo and America Online, were sued by advertisers who claimed they were charged for invalid clicks dating back to 2002. Google has agreed to pay as much as $US90 million to settle the case.

The practice of click fraud -- clicking on ads to cost a competitor money or to bump up commissions for Web publishers -- has come under scrutiny of late, and some experts worry that it ultimately could threaten Google's main source of revenue, pay-per-click advertising.

Google reported revenue of $US6.14 billion for fiscal 2005, most of which came from pay-per-click ads.

After meeting with Google engineers over the course of three visits and examining internal documents, Tuzhilin concluded that Google's Click Quality team, formed in 2003, is now doing a reasonable job in fighting fraud.

"Although the Click Quality team's solutions were still not perfect ... the invalid clicking problem at Google was 'under control' by the end of 2005," Tuzhilin wrote.

In fact, Google was hit by several "massive" click fraud attacks in 2005, Tuzhilin wrote. "Although not perfect, Google detection software managed to remove massive amounts of clicks during these attacks.'

Tuzhilin's report can be found here: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/pdf/Tuzhilin_Report.pdf

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Robert McMillan

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

David Coyle

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.

Kurt Hegetschweiler

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

It’s perfect for mobile workers. Just take it out — it’s small enough to sit anywhere — turn it on, load a sheet of paper, and start printing.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?