Microsoft fined Euro 280.5m by EU

The European Commission has fined Microsoft Euro 280.5 million ($US357 million) for failing to comply with the terms of a March 2004 antitrust judgement against it, the Commission said on Wednesday.

Microsoft has already paid a Euro 497 million fine as a result of the judgement, in which the Commission found that Microsoft had used its near-monopoly in the PC operating systems market to gain advantage in the markets for work group server operating systems and media players.

At the time, the Commission also ordered the company to release a version of Windows XP without a built-in media player, and to provide its competitors with technical details of communication protocols used by its server products.

The Euro 280.5 million fine announced Wednesday is to punish the company for failing to provide those technical details in a timely manner. If Microsoft continues to fail to comply, the Commission will increase the amount of the daily fine to Euro 3 million per day, it said.

"Microsoft says it's committing huge resources to tackling this problem. It's a shame they didn't do so two years ago," said Neelie Kroes, the European Union's competition commissioner.

Microsoft immediately dismissed the decision as inappropriate given what it called its "good-faith efforts" to comply with the judgement. General Counsel Brad Smith called the level of the fine unjustified and said Microsoft would appeal to the European courts to determine whether its compliance efforts have been sufficient and if the fine is justified.

"The fine announced today is larger than the fines the Commission has imposed for even the most severe competition law infringements, such as price-fixing cartels," Smith said in a statement. "When you consider Microsoft's massive efforts to comply with this ruling, and the fact that more than a dozen companies are already using similar documentation provided in the U.S. to ship actual products, we do not believe this fine is justified."

He reiterated Microsoft's position that the Commission's original decision lacked clarity.

The Commission clearly had not accepted that argument, however.

"I don't buy Microsoft's line that they didn't know what the Commission wanted. It was clear. Microsoft's documentation fell significantly short of the requirements," Kroes said.

Asked how the decision affects Windows Vista, Kroes said the forthcoming OS must "avoid the problems highlighted in the 2004 decision."

"Hopefully when Vista launches next year, all the issues of the 2004 ruling will have been taken into account," she said.

The Commission initially gave Microsoft 120 days to disclose details of the software interfaces used by its server products to communicate with the desktop versions of Windows, so that competing vendors could build compatible systems. Progress was slow, and in March last year, and then again in June, the Commission threatened the company with additional fines if it didn't fully comply with the ruling.

Microsoft succeeded in pushing back the deadline numerous times as negotiations continued, but the Commission remained unsatisfied with Microsoft's progress, notably in documenting its software interfaces.

Microsoft is due to submit the final batch of technical documentation required by the Commission by July 18, according to a timetable the two parties agreed with the independent monitoring trustee appointed to oversee matters.

"Nearly 50 percent of the documentation is there. Now we must check if the specifications are correct," Kroes said on Wednesday. She said she felt sure that the company would not ignore the daily fines, and said it has been making "constructive efforts" to comply since June 20.

The Commission had earlier threatened fines of up to Euro 2 million a day until all the required information about the communications protocols had been supplied. The Euro 280.5 million figure is based on a fine of Euro 1.5 million per day, for the period from Dec. 15 to June 20.

On Nov. 10, the Commission warned Microsoft that it had not complied with two elements of the antitrust judgement, and would be fined Euro 2 million a day if it did not comply by Dec. 15.

More recently, the Commission determined that as of June 20, Microsoft had still not complied with one of those obligations, supplying the documentation. This failure eliminated the effectiveness of the remedy, the Commission said Wednesday, and so it had decided to impose a larger part of the daily penalty payment of Euro 2 million.

If Microsoft has still not complied by July 31, then the Commission could decide to double the fine, to Euro 3 million per day.

In a separate action, Microsoft has also appealed against the antitrust ruling itself. The European Court of First Instance in Luxembourg finally heard that appeal in late April, and is now considering its decision.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Paul Meller and Peter Sayer

IDG News Service
Show Comments


James Cook University - Master of Data Science Online Course

Learn more >


Victorinox Werks Professional Executive 17 Laptop Case

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?