Wikipedia, competition, and the future

By the time you read this column, Wikipedia will be celebrating its fifth anniversary. It's been a wilder ride than anybody could have imagined, and it's gotten even more so lately. In a widely cited incident, John Seigenthaler, Sr., a prominent journalist, publisher, and political figure, reacted with justifiable horror when he learned that his bio entry in Wikipedia falsely implicated him in the assassination of Robert Kennedy.

The ensuing flap was an ironic validation of Wikipedia's success. Libelous attacks posted to backwater blogs and message boards are easily dismissed. But given Wikipedia's reputation, the insult was magnified accordingly.

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger foresaw this in an essay published a year ago. He diagnosed the problem as excessive anti-elitism, and he predicted that the project might need to fork -- that is, launch a new version with a governance model that would value experts more highly and rely on them to ensure consistent quality.

Sure enough, Sanger emerged last month as a director of Digital Universe, a new service planned for early 2006. "In the Digital Universe, a Ph.D. matters," founder Joe Firmage told CNET Credentialed experts will be paid to review articles, and those they approve will be labeled as such.

If Digital Universe does take on Wikipedia in 2006, it's sure to be a media circus. There are aspects of this story that you couldn't make up.

Wired News reported that Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales edited his own Wikipedia bio in order to minimize Larry Sanger's role in the creation of the service, as well as to downplay the adult-oriented nature of Wales' first dot-com venture.

And Joe Firmage, many will remember, was once labeled "Silicon Valley's Fox Mulder." After selling his first software company to Novell and founding USWeb, Firmage experienced a dreamlike encounter that inspired him to write a lengthy, self-published, and widely ridiculed book advancing theories about extraterrestrial visitation and antigravity.

Like I said, you couldn't make this stuff up. But the issues at stake are quite real. It will be fascinating to watch Wikipedia's open content process evolve in response to criticism and competition, and to compare its governance model to that of open source.

It's widely acknowledged that Wikipedia's radically low barrier to entry helped fuel its explosive early growth. That's now been ratcheted up a notch. Only registered users can create new topics. But anyone can still edit an existing article and many registered Wikipedians operate pseudonymously. These freedoms are an essential part of the culture.

The wiki medium, Socialtext's Ross Mayfield has said, "denatures personality." Whereas open source developers are often motivated by a desire to build strong individual reputations, Wikipedians care more about inclusiveness and consensus. Enforcing better accountability without eroding these core values will require tricky social engineering.

Judging the quality of article entries is an even trickier matter. Like open source projects, Wikipedia is a meritocracy that rewards hard work and excellent results. Neither culture values the Ph.D. for its own sake. But where open source operates in a single domain of expertise, Wikipedia spans myriad domains. While it can't hire expertise a la Digital Universe, a program to attract qualified volunteer reviewers could gain traction. Wikipedia is a remarkable service that has earned much goodwill.

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jon Udell

Show Comments

Cool Tech

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Stocking Stuffer

SmartLens - Clip on Phone Camera Lens Set of 3

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Aysha Strobbe

Microsoft Office 365/HP Spectre x360

Microsoft Office continues to make a student’s life that little bit easier by offering reliable, easy to use, time-saving functionality, while continuing to develop new features that further enhance what is already a formidable collection of applications

Michael Hargreaves

Microsoft Office 365/Dell XPS 15 2-in-1

I’d recommend a Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 and the new Windows 10 to anyone who needs to get serious work done (before you kick back on your couch with your favourite Netflix show.)

Maryellen Rose George

Brother PT-P750W

It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!

Cathy Giles

Brother MFC-L8900CDW

The Brother MFC-L8900CDW is an absolute stand out. I struggle to fault it.

Luke Hill


I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.

Emily Tyson

MSI GE63 Raider

If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?