Wikipedia, competition, and the future

By the time you read this column, Wikipedia will be celebrating its fifth anniversary. It's been a wilder ride than anybody could have imagined, and it's gotten even more so lately. In a widely cited incident, John Seigenthaler, Sr., a prominent journalist, publisher, and political figure, reacted with justifiable horror when he learned that his bio entry in Wikipedia falsely implicated him in the assassination of Robert Kennedy.

The ensuing flap was an ironic validation of Wikipedia's success. Libelous attacks posted to backwater blogs and message boards are easily dismissed. But given Wikipedia's reputation, the insult was magnified accordingly.

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger foresaw this in an essay published a year ago. He diagnosed the problem as excessive anti-elitism, and he predicted that the project might need to fork -- that is, launch a new version with a governance model that would value experts more highly and rely on them to ensure consistent quality.

Sure enough, Sanger emerged last month as a director of Digital Universe, a new service planned for early 2006. "In the Digital Universe, a Ph.D. matters," founder Joe Firmage told CNET Credentialed experts will be paid to review articles, and those they approve will be labeled as such.

If Digital Universe does take on Wikipedia in 2006, it's sure to be a media circus. There are aspects of this story that you couldn't make up.

Wired News reported that Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales edited his own Wikipedia bio in order to minimize Larry Sanger's role in the creation of the service, as well as to downplay the adult-oriented nature of Wales' first dot-com venture.

And Joe Firmage, many will remember, was once labeled "Silicon Valley's Fox Mulder." After selling his first software company to Novell and founding USWeb, Firmage experienced a dreamlike encounter that inspired him to write a lengthy, self-published, and widely ridiculed book advancing theories about extraterrestrial visitation and antigravity.

Like I said, you couldn't make this stuff up. But the issues at stake are quite real. It will be fascinating to watch Wikipedia's open content process evolve in response to criticism and competition, and to compare its governance model to that of open source.

It's widely acknowledged that Wikipedia's radically low barrier to entry helped fuel its explosive early growth. That's now been ratcheted up a notch. Only registered users can create new topics. But anyone can still edit an existing article and many registered Wikipedians operate pseudonymously. These freedoms are an essential part of the culture.

The wiki medium, Socialtext's Ross Mayfield has said, "denatures personality." Whereas open source developers are often motivated by a desire to build strong individual reputations, Wikipedians care more about inclusiveness and consensus. Enforcing better accountability without eroding these core values will require tricky social engineering.

Judging the quality of article entries is an even trickier matter. Like open source projects, Wikipedia is a meritocracy that rewards hard work and excellent results. Neither culture values the Ph.D. for its own sake. But where open source operates in a single domain of expertise, Wikipedia spans myriad domains. While it can't hire expertise a la Digital Universe, a program to attract qualified volunteer reviewers could gain traction. Wikipedia is a remarkable service that has earned much goodwill.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jon Udell

Show Comments



Victorinox Werks Professional Executive 17 Laptop Case

Learn more >

Sansai 6-Outlet Power Board + 4-Port USB Charging Station

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?