Slippery open source

If you work with open source software, you've been to the place I'll describe in this column more times than you care to count. It always starts innocently enough. In my case, I needed to re-create a Linux-based development environment on my Apple PowerBook. The essential ingredients were Apache, Berkeley DB, mod_python, and libxml2. Pretty standard stuff, but I'd never assembled all the pieces on Mac OS X.

If you don't work with open source software, it's hard to explain how weird this process of assembly can be. I've never actually run Autoconf (, the GNU tool that's used to generate the configuration scripts that probe every nook and cranny of your operating system, compiler, and libraries. But I've run lots of configuration scripts, and I fondly remember the cover of a 1988 issue of The Perl Journal. It depicted an Underwood typewriter, circa 1940, with this transcript rolling across the platen:

# sh ./Configure

Beginning of configuration questions for Perl 5.

Hmm ... this looks like an Underwood portable.

AFS does not seem to be running...

Installation prefix to use? (/usr)

Warning: no "1" key detected. Using "l" instead.

Use which C compiler? (CC)

This perfectly captures the experience of building free software from source. It's rarely so hopeless, but it often turns into a dizzying game of chutes and ladders -- especially on a Mac.

In this case, the slide down the slippery slope began when mod_python told me it preferred Apache 2 to the stock Apache 1.3 that Apple ships. That upgrade went smoothly, but I knew Apple's stock Python 2.3.5 wasn't the one I wanted mod_python to use. So I pointed its configure script at /opt/local, where I'd built a Python 2.4 with the libxml2 and Berkeley DB bindings I wanted. But when I fired up Apache, it reported a mod_python built with Python 2.3.5, not 2.4.

Yeah, I shoulda read the instructions. It's been a while since I used mod_python, and although it used to let you point to any instance of Python, now it will use only the installed one.

Well, OK. I'd been meaning to upgrade to the newest production Python, 2.4.3, which was released last month. And lo, there's even a binary installer for Mac Python. Joy! Except it doesn't include the libxml2 bindings, and when I try to build them, the tool chain can't cope with the universal binaries the installer gave me. Sorrow.

Well, OK. Binary installers are for wimps, anyway. Real men and women build from source. So I try, GCC spews forth alarming messages about "semwait" and "bad file descriptors." Inevitably, I wind up Googling for these obscure error messages.

The first proposed workaround sounds plausible: Switch from GCC 4 to GCC 3. No dice. The second sounds unlikely: Download the source again and start over. But I do, and for no apparent reason, this time it works.

Now admittedly, most of the issues I ran into were Mac-related. Linux is home base for open source software, and things always go much more smoothly in that environment. I can almost understand how some folks throw away OS X and install Linux on Apple hardware -- almost, but not quite. Until Linux feels better than OS X on a laptop, I guess I'll keep playing these games. ... although I've got my eye on a nice-looking Underwood typewriter.

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jon Udell

Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Tom Pope

Dynabook Portégé X30L-G

Ultimately this laptop has achieved everything I would hope for in a laptop for work, while fitting that into a form factor and weight that is remarkable.

Tom Sellers


This smart laptop was enjoyable to use and great to work on – creating content was super simple.

Lolita Wang


It really doesn’t get more “gaming laptop” than this.

Jack Jeffries


As the Maserati or BMW of laptops, it would fit perfectly in the hands of a professional needing firepower under the hood, sophistication and class on the surface, and gaming prowess (sports mode if you will) in between.

Taylor Carr


The MSI PS63 is an amazing laptop and I would definitely consider buying one in the future.

Christopher Low

Brother RJ-4230B

This small mobile printer is exactly what I need for invoicing and other jobs such as sending fellow tradesman details or step-by-step instructions that I can easily print off from my phone or the Web.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?