Microsoft still trying to change the game

Is Vista light years, or warp speed ahead?

The assertion that "Vista is light years ahead" of Windows XP on security kicked off a storm of e-mail at the Burton Group.

"What is really the difference?" asked one analyst. "It won't matter how far ahead Vista is.... If the alerts [from User Account Control (UAC)] get too annoying, the users will just turn them off and then who cares?"

I responded: "There's a lot more to Vista than UAC. There's service hardening, full volume encryption, device driver signing, kernel patch protection, address space layout randomization, better group policy, better crypto and smart card support and generally higher-quality code."

Unconvinced, the analyst replied: "I still have to buy [antivirus] or pay Microsoft for it. I still have to deploy firewalls. I still need some type of patching system. Where is the benefit of Vista?"

Another analyst, a Mac user, added: "If you have to patch it less frequently, if it's easier to manage (for example, through improved group policy), that's a big win for an enterprise. But all this just reduces cost and management overhead; the actual security difference is probably not huge."

This implies Vista is only light years ahead, not warp speed ahead. While most attacks are being developed for Office, Internet Explorer and application-layer components, Vista will receive its share. The new operating system doesn't really change the reactive patch, update and clean paradigm of endpoint protection.

"Recall the debut of Windows 95," another analyst said. "People lined up like they do now for gaming consoles. It was a big deal. Now the [operating system] is fading into the appliance, at least as far as the consumer is concerned. If the packaging were simpler, the pricing more aggressive, and the features liberating instead of constraining [with digital rights management], more people would upgrade in advance of buying a new PC, helping Microsoft convert the installed base faster. Microsoft's actions do not typify a company that's defining the future but one that's protecting the past."

Vista will protect Microsoft's desktop dynasty, but migration will come at a cautious pace. Given Vista's large hardware footprint and compatibility issues with security tools such as existing third-party antivirus and Internet Explorer 6 applications, there is little reason for enterprises to rush forward before Microsoft's partner ecosystem works out the kinks. Consumers will get Vista when they buy new machines. Enterprises should generally deploy Vista per their desktop refresh cycle, but may need to delay for months if stability issues or compatibility with applications, management or security infrastructure arise.

Doubts and caveats notwithstanding, enterprises should look to leverage Vista in conjunction with other security infrastructure initiatives that Microsoft discussed in its keynote presentation at the recent RSA Conference. These include Network Access Protection and IPSec end-to-end authentication/policy enforcement. Yet another area of opportunity centres around Microsoft's work on implementing identity management and Web services security standards such as WS-* and OpenID.

Vista security is mostly something you create, not purchase. Vista migration for the enterprise should be part of a larger strategic goal to get the user out of the sysadmin loop and improve the security of applications running on the operating system. This involves establishing managed desktop environments, and working with vendors and business developers to reduce application privilege requirements. Worries about UAC should recede, and systems can be made less susceptible to malware and other attacks. These are the kinds of things that could change the game.

Blum is senior vice president and research director with the Burton Group, an integrated research, consulting and advisory service. He can be reached at

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Daniel Blum

Network World
Show Comments

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?