Lo-Fi Wi-Fi: Taking it to the streets

Signing a service-level agreement will guarantee you'll get the WiFi network you paid for

Strange times in Portland, Oregon: The Unwired Portland project is aimed at delivering Wi-Fi access to every part of the city, but some people just don't get it -- the signal, that is.

According to a recent story on CNN's Web site, the project engineering left something to be desired. The contractor engineered the system -- and no doubt, the bill that Portland has to pay -- with some 25 Wi-Fi access points every square mile. This, it seems, would place all users within 500 feet of an access point. Unless you want to sit on your front porch, however, or perhaps be willing to walk down the street a bit, you might not get any signal at all.

Hmmm. Some users might resolve the problem by purchasing and installing an outdoor antenna or bridge. Although the network operator notes this is a US$150 cost, a quick look into its online store shows that some antennas would run a user close to $300 including installation. Some might not consider that to be "free wireless."

The alternative, according to the provider, would be to quadruple the deployment of access points so no user would be more than 250 feet away from a signal source. The leader of the project sums it up nicely in the CNN story: "The network cost gets completely out of whack. The business model breaks in its entirety."

So, what went wrong? Two possibilities jump to mind, both unsettling. The first: We assume the network provider has integrity but lacks the ability to engineer a metropolitan network appropriately. Not good. The second: We assume the provider knows how to engineer a metro network properly but, as the project leader noted, a design that quadruples the number of installed access points probably would never have gotten through the proposal stage.

Perhaps the goal of the network provider was simply to win the bid (with a low bid, most likely) and worry about the effectiveness later. (This is pure conjecture because I was not party to any of this.)

What I do know is that not all Wi-Fi products are created equal. We've benchmarked many products and have seen differences in device rates and ranges that conservatively can be called dramatic. In the case of Portland, the difference between deploying one product or another could be the difference between success and failure. One test we published last year using 802.11a (rather than 802.11b/g) showed a single client could maintain 18Mbps throughput at 500 feet -- the magic number for Portland. Additional tests showed throughput of more than 10Mbps and 1,500 feet -- and even 1Mbps at 1,700 feet.

Thus, equipment matters. Nonetheless, a scan of the network provider's Web site provides no readily available information about the technology being used to deliver their metro Wi-Fi coverage. Truth be told, this is no real surprise. Today's metro Wi-Fi providers seem to be following the practice of the ISPs: They are more than happy to tell you how great their service is, but fail to reveal anything about the infrastructure that they are putting in place to deliver that service.

Let Portland serve as a lesson to anyone building metro or campus LANs. Before you sign that purchase order, make the service provider sign a service-level agreement guaranteeing you'll get what you paid for -- without having to pay more.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Kevin Tolly

Network World
Show Comments

Cool Tech

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?