Microsoft: We patch faster than Apple, Novell, Red Hat

Not so fast, says security analyst: 'Nobody gets a gold star'

Windows users were at risk for in-the-wild vulnerabilities fewer days on average last year than users of rival operating systems from Apple, Novell, Red Hat and Sun, a Microsoft executive claimed.

Jeff Jones, strategy director in Microsoft's security technology unit, has posted findings that show Microsoft released patches for vulnerabilities in Windows overall -- and Windows XP in particular -- faster than its four competitors did for flaws in their software. A Symantec executive acknowledged that Jones' data "reads accurate."

In two entries on his CSO blog, Jones laid out his analysis of "days-of-risk," a term that describes the time from when a vulnerability is announced or goes public, to when the vendor releases a fix. By Jones' calculations, Windows -- including 2000, XP and Server 2003 -- boasted an average days-of-risk (or DoR) last year of just under 29 days, compared to Mac OS X's 46 days, SuSE Linux Enterprise's 74, Red Hat Enterprise Linux's 107, and Sun Solaris' whopping 168.

That puts Microsoft 159% faster than Apple in preparing and distributing patches, 255% faster than Novell, and 579% faster than Sun.

When Jones focused on specific operating system clients -- Windows XP SP2, Mac OS X 10.4, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Workstation, and SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 9 -- Microsoft still took first place, although the race was tighter. Windows XP was patched after an average of 53.3 DoR, just 1.6% faster than Apple's Tiger at 54.2 DoR. SuSE and Red Hat came in third and fourth, with 56.2 and 70.5 DoR respectively.

Alfred Huger, vice president of engineering with Symantec's security response group, said that Jones' numbers look reasonable. "Our latest ISTRs (Internet Security Threat Reports) had more or less the same." In its most recent report, Symantec's reckoning pegged Windows' average DoR for the last six months of 2006 at 21 days, Red Hat's at 58, Mac OS X's at 66, and Sun's at 122.

"We don't disagree, certainly [on the numbers]" said Huger. "[Jones'] reads accurate."

Some readers of Jones' CSO postings, however, had questions. "Where's your data?" asked someone identified as RJ Ryan. "It's hard to take you seriously otherwise." Others commenting on Jones' first posting wanted to know how many vulnerabilities were included in each count for a more detailed comparison. Jones responded to the latter by citing the number of vulnerabilities included in each OS's DoR in Monday's blog. During 2006, Windows XP was patched for 90 bugs, Mac OS X for 129, SuSE for 232, and Red Hat for 301.

But if history is any guide, it's unlikely everyone will take Jones at his word. In March, when Jones used other patch comparisons to claim Windows Vista deserved an A+ security report card, some Computerworld readers scoffed. "Microsoft touts the larger (by orders of magnitude) number of bugs in various Linux distros, but fails to mention that most (if not all) of those bugs were not in the core Linux OS, but in applications that are shipped with the kernel," argued a reader tagged as "Filker0."

Huger thinks everyone, Jones included, is missing the point. "Even [just] 21 or 25 days isn't great," said Symantec's Huger. "The bigger issue, I think, is how attackers are monetizing vulnerabilities, how it's more commercially-driven. They're competing for access to your computer, and that makes unpatched vulnerabilities even more valuable.

"Nobody gets a gold star on this," he said. "Everyone has to work a lot harder."

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Gregg Keizer

Show Comments


James Cook University - Master of Data Science Online Course

Learn more >


Sansai 6-Outlet Power Board + 4-Port USB Charging Station

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?