SCO Group: Mini-Me trying to be Darth Vader

It’s been a long road but the end of The SCO Group is in sight

Sometime before March 2003 The SCO Group decided that making products that people might want to buy was passe and decided to get into the "business" of filing lawsuits instead. Their first target was IBM but they soon expanded their scope to take on the entire open source community and scores of businesses actually trying to do things that benefited society. It's been a long road since then but the end is now in site - the end of The SCO Group that is.

I've written about The SCO Group a number of times ("Slime for sale,", A quiz about 2006, Microsoft: Delaying product, spewing FUD and "SCO's last gasp?"). I expect this will be my next-to-last column on them -- the column that I expect to be the last one, not lamenting their passing, may come soon.

On March 6, 2003 The SCO Group sued IBM claiming that IBM had done all sorts of bad things with SCO Group intellectual property rights (IPR) and asking for a billion dollars or so to right the alleged wrongs. The lawsuit all depended on the statement in paragraph 18 of the complaint: "SCO is the present owner of all software code and licensing rights to System V Technology."

On August 10, Judge Dale A. Kimball ruled that SCO was in error when they wrote that paragraph. The judge ruled that SCO does not own the copyrights to Unix. He also ruled that Novell could force SCO to drop all actions against IBM that depended on such ownership and, to complete the picture, that SCO owes Novell a pile of money of yet to be determined size. These rulings more than take the wind out of SCO's sails, they are likely SCO's death notice -- and this could not happen to nicer people.

After suing IBM SCO went after the Linux community, saying that they wanted US$700 license fee per machine to pay for what they claimed were millions of lines of SCO-owned code on Linux. They even sued a few companies that were using Linux. SCO made it very clear that it would be quite happy if Linux, as an open source software effort, was killed by SCO's actions. The move that resulted in the current ruling was SCO deciding to sue Novell when Novell had the audacity to point out that SCO did not actually own the Unix copyrights.

Even before this ruling SCO's case against IBM was in deep trouble after they were only able to point to 326 lines of possibly infringing code in Linux and after the court tossed many of SCO's contentions against IBM ("SCO Group's last gasp?").

The same judge who ruled that SCO did not have the IPR they claimed to have is presiding over the IBM case. According to Groklaw, the incredibly well done site that has been following the case, he has now ordered that the parties in that case present statements of the impact of his Novell decision on the IBM case by the end of the month. It looks from these developments that the SCO cases and thus, SCO itself, are toast.

Because of the facts of the case, we are about to be rid of a Mini-Me-sized company that aspired to be Darth Vader -- destroying Linux and extracting tribute from IBM and the open source federation. That leaves a rather different threat still pending. Microsoft continues to hint that it has a Death Star that is about ready to fire on and destroy open source. Like SCO, Microsoft will not actually show anyone what violations they think they have uncovered. Maybe, in the end, Microsoft will be shown to have as little behind the curtain as SCO had. Until then, lets rejoice that the end is near for one slime merchant.

Disclaimer: Harvard has seen a lot of slime merchants come and go but has not expressed an opinion on this one.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Scott Bradner

Network World
Show Comments


James Cook University - Master of Data Science Online Course

Learn more >




Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?