Where now, Yahoo?

Let's say you're the new CEO of Yahoo. You, the new CEO, are on the hook to fix the problem of Google...

Let's say you're the new CEO of Yahoo. You're running an outfit that's maybe one of the oldest brands in the portal marketplace, but your company has been eclipsed in revenue and stock performance by upstart Google. You, the new CEO, are on the hook to fix the problem. What do you do?

There are a lot of tempting comments that could be made about making your brand more attractive, building your dominance in search advertising, buying this company or that, getting into the desktop software business, taking on Microsoft and IBM and Google and maybe the Republicans and Democrats and a few world governments.

All of them might create a moment's glitz, but none are likely to change Yahoo's fortunes. They all smack of what's called (with apologies for the inherent political incorrectness of a hunting analogy) "shooting behind the duck." Anything Yahoo does to fix its position in the market has to reflect where the market is going, not where it is. The good news is that there are some tried-and-true principles that could help Yahoo reinvent itself successfully.

Principle No. 1 is to make your competitors' strengths into weaknesses. Archrival Google has a stranglehold on search advertising, one that's not broken overnight and may not even be breakable. So don't rush out with announcements of your own search advertising strategy, Mister Yahoo, and shore up the very position where Google is strongest. Instead, look at some reality -- two realities in particular.

The first reality is that there is a lot more to advertising than the Internet. Yeah, sure, Google has worked to expand itself outside click-ads, but think outside the box here, Yahoo. For example, is it not true that search ads manipulate a different kind of buyer activity than TV ads? You can't stimulate impulse buying with search ads; do you expect the consumer to do random searches in the hope of finding an interesting product? Then there's the fact that providing click-ads related to product searches becomes less valuable as the customer settles on a storefront of choice. I don't look for products on Google or Yahoo, I look for them on Amazon.

There's also the fact that as you stick more paid ads into search results, you get users more frustrated with what they find. Do searches end up displaying three or four pages of paid-for, irrelevant ads before they get to something a user might actually want to see? Could it be that there are better ways to integrate advertising with search? If so, find them and devalue the basic Google click-ad paradigm.

The second reality is that Google has been chest-butting with the both incumbent LECs and cable companies on net neutrality. OK, we all want everything to be free -- Internet, content, BMWs, nice vacations . . . you get the picture. Realistically it's not going to happen. Why not be the portal company who embraces "net reality" instead? Work with access providers, Internet core players and others to secure some premium-experience deals that can be invoked on selected media or other types of delivery. Create a partnership with the infrastructure players that will make the Yahoo content look better, arrive faster. Make Google defend a net-neutral stance or be forced to abandon it. Then rub its nose in the result.

The second basic principle is to play to your own strengths. What does Yahoo have going for it? A good reputation with business, good relationships with the US. RBOCs, and a great mashup strategy with Yahoo pipes. That's a lot of positive turf to own, in some key areas, and why not exploit it?

My research shows that mashups are now the No. 1 tool enterprises propose to exploit to improve worker productivity. Aren't the people inhabiting Yahoo's business pages workers? Might they not be interested in ways to improve productivity through creative application of pipes? But go to one of the popular business pages, like the Finance tab of the Yahoo site, and you'd never know that mashups or pipes existed. Why not promote the notion of piping news and other data where the data is already presented?

Then there's the linkage with the service providers. Could Yahoo pipes be used to pipe media, to pipe collaborative videoconferences or other collaborations? Could users mash a lot of other applications, and a lot of services, with pipes? Might these service mashups then not be suitable for premium enhancement through a relationship with those service providers with whom Yahoo already partners? Could you pipe a video with a leading ad (which the industry calls a preroll) and offer it over priority service paid for by the advertiser? Providers like BT have already exposed some voice-oriented service APIs; can multimedia be far behind?

Yahoo, you have the opportunity to build a bridge between the Internet, traditional media, business productivity and premium (meaning pay-for) services. That is a very powerful opportunity to have, and your rival Google has already come down on the wrong side of many, if not all, these key topics. Google's weakness and your strength align well here, and the thing I find most surprising is that you haven't leveraged these critical spaces better already. That's the bad news. The good news is that you have an opportunity now, and perhaps an even better one. Business is moving in mashups. The carriers are publishing APIs and starting to encourage developers to use premium services. The iron, as the old cliche goes, is hot. So strike!

Right now, Google is No. 1. If Yahoo wants to be No. 1, then things have to change. Earth to Yahoo; you don't get things to change by advocating sameness.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Thomas Nolle

Network World
Show Comments

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Maryellen Rose George

Brother PT-P750W

It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!

Cathy Giles

Brother MFC-L8900CDW

The Brother MFC-L8900CDW is an absolute stand out. I struggle to fault it.

Luke Hill

MSI GT75 TITAN

I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.

Emily Tyson

MSI GE63 Raider

If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.

Laura Johnston

MSI GS65 Stealth Thin

If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?