When selling snake oil catches up with you

InfoSec experts, law suits regard Identity theft protection services as nothing more than a sham.

Recent reporting from AP and The Charleston Gazette demonstrates that selling snake oil will eventually catch up with you. LifeLock, an identity theft protection company based in Arizona, is facing a class-action lawsuit alleging that their services are 'inept' at preventing identity theft from taking place.

To be fair to LifeLock, it is possible to manage identity data so as to mitigate against loss, but it will only take a single breach of even a perfect security system to lose all data. The services as described on its site seem to be about simplifying already available processes -- allowing users of the service to pay others to go through the hassle of contacting credit agencies, banks and other appropriate bodies when necessary.

Is it something to build a business around, or is it sufficient to mitigate against identity theft? LifeLock seems to think so, but InfoSec experts might have a different opinion. It is certainly a good place to start, but it isn't going to stop everything, as the court case claims is happening. When the company is alleged to be turning over in excess of $100 million per year just from doing what consumers can do for free, it is bound to attract attention.

While it is admirable that the CEO of LifeLock was so confident in his service's capability that he openly advertised his Social Security Number (SSN) - 457-55-5462 - as a key part of the advertising campaign, it has since come back to haunt him with the lawsuit alleging that there has been one documented case where the CEO's identity was successfully compromised, at least 80 attempts with varying levels of success, and the basic details of his personal records associated with the SSN changed.

Mass advertising and blogging sock puppets aplenty make it difficult to identify legitimate third party observations and reporting and generally leave the impression that it is more snake oil than substance.

Unfortunately, it is becoming more and more difficult to tell the snake oil from the real when it comes to Information Security marketing. Clarke's Third and Fourth laws certainly hold true ("Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" and "For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert") with InfoSec marketing, but a good rule of thumb is that all marketing can not be trusted until you can verify with your own testing that the product does what it is being marketed as doing.

LifeLock's claims had many believing them, but they also had many who were {xref:http://fraudwar.blogspot.com/2008/05/another-law-suit-filed-against-lifelock.html|dubiouslLaw suit filed against Lifelock]] of the claims, including allegations that credit bureaus were behind a series of allegations in mid-2007 about impropriety carried out by the company founders and complaints earlier this year from one bureau that LifeLock's actions are illegal.

Perhaps the sorry state of affairs is best summed up by the experiences of one poor consumer who had their identity stolen via debit card theft. The victim was not initially a customer of LifeLock, it was the thief who opened an account with LifeLock using the card and who received the subscription.

Nothing Identity theft protection companies offer is any different from what the average user can do on their own, generally for free. Where they seem to try and differentiate themselves is in removing the hassle of doing it yourself, even if that hassle only exists in their marketing literature. Generally the only identity theft protection they offer is for financial services, but there is a whole world of identity theft opportunities that they do not protect against, including compromise of medical data and other forms of non-credit related identity theft.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Carl Jongsma

Computerworld
Show Comments

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Tom Pope

Dynabook Portégé X30L-G

Ultimately this laptop has achieved everything I would hope for in a laptop for work, while fitting that into a form factor and weight that is remarkable.

Tom Sellers

MSI P65

This smart laptop was enjoyable to use and great to work on – creating content was super simple.

Lolita Wang

MSI GT76

It really doesn’t get more “gaming laptop” than this.

Jack Jeffries

MSI GS75

As the Maserati or BMW of laptops, it would fit perfectly in the hands of a professional needing firepower under the hood, sophistication and class on the surface, and gaming prowess (sports mode if you will) in between.

Taylor Carr

MSI PS63

The MSI PS63 is an amazing laptop and I would definitely consider buying one in the future.

Christopher Low

Brother RJ-4230B

This small mobile printer is exactly what I need for invoicing and other jobs such as sending fellow tradesman details or step-by-step instructions that I can easily print off from my phone or the Web.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?