New industry group tries its hand at DRM

In the latest effort to respond to the threat from online piracy, a group of large media and technology companies on Wednesday unveiled a new specification for a technology that will distribute digital content to consumers online while honoring complex contractual relationships that exist among media owners.

The group, which calls itself the Content Reference Forum (CRF), is a new, cross-industry standards organization that counts leading technology and media companies as members, including Universal Music Group Inc., Microsoft Corp., Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp. (NTT) and VeriSign Inc., according to a statement released by the group.

The goal is to design a technology platform that enables media companies and other digital content owners to distribute content across different technology environments and geographical regions, according to Albhy Galuten, chairman of the CRF and a former advanced technical lead at Universal Music Group.

"Nobody has addressed the issues of how to make (online content distribution) effective and seamless," he said.

For example, a Top 10 music file link from a music fan in the U.S. that is sent to a friend in France should take into account that user's language preferences. Also, if the user does not personally own a copy of the song, they should be able to purchase it in a way that takes into account the various contractual agreements that music companies and distributors have for music sales in France, Galuten said.

"It's a means to resolve a content reference so that consumers can locate, buy and acquire appropriate instances of that content," he said.

Current online music and content distribution services, such as Apple Computer Inc.'s iTunes and Roxio Inc.'s Napster, amount to a balkanization of the music industry, with companies building their own distribution systems to encourage sales of other products, such as the iPod portable music player, Galuten said.

"There's no reason you shouldn't have access to the first Led Zeppelin album on a Sony device, your PC or Napster," he said.

The draft specifications, known as the CRF Baseline Profile v1.0, were published for public comment Wednesday on the group's Web site, at http://www.crforum.org. The specifications cover formats for "Content References," which the CRF defines as "data packages that uniquely identify content and the context in which it will be used." That might include information about the consumer's specific environment, Galuten said.

Also explained in the specifications is a new language called the "Contracts Expression Language" (CEL) that is designed to "express and enforce contractual agreements." That will allow information in a content link to be compared against a database of contractual agreements, so companies can ensure that the appropriate compensation is paid to each "value chain player" that helped that user obtain the media, he said.

The CRF will build on the work of other standards groups such as the Moving Pictures Experts Group (MPEG) 21 and the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS), Galuten said. "We're not trying to reinvent the wheel," he said.

At the same time, CRF members did not feel that their work fit within any of those groups. The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) lacked an intellectual property policy that was strong enough to satisfy CRF participants, according to Galuten. And OASIS lacked a sufficient focus on content distribution and commerce, he said. In addition, group members found their efforts on the OASIS Rights Language Technical Committee stymied by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), due to what Galuten characterized as OASIS' "difficult" governance rules.

Instead, the CRF will adopt technology from MPEG, OASIS and other groups and also try to build a technical framework that "plugs into" the work of those organizations, according to Dmitry Radbel, a member of the Requirements and Architecture Working Group at the CRF and a vice president of advanced technologies at Universal Music Group.

The CRF Baseline Profile Version 1.0 will be available for review and public comment for 90 days after which the group will incorporate suggested changes and vote on whether to make the specifications an official standard, Galuten said.

The CRF also expects to demonstrate technology based on its specifications in the near future. Examples of online reference services will soon be available, one run by Universal and the other by VeriSign. The group also expects to announce a Microsoft Media Player plug-in that will enable users to follow CRF content links to purchase or play media files with that program, Radbel said.

Asked to comment on the CRF's plans, an attorney for the EFF said the CRF's specifications are the foundation for a digital rights management system, about which the EFF has "deep concerns."

The Baseline Profile Version 1.0 seems to envision a system where content owners put copyright content in a locked box, then decide who gets to take it out of that box and for what reasons, according to Jason Schultz, a staff attorney at the EFF.

The restrictions on use stipulated by the CRF's Content References may deny access to individuals who wish to use media files for parody or political expression, an exercise of civil liberties guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, Schultz said, citing online publication of internal Diebold Inc. memos regarding voting system technology and a recent work that remixed video and words by U.S. President Bush into a potent political message.

Architectures such as those proposed by the CRF may do a good job of representing the rights of content owners, but could have a "chilling effect" on speech and artistic expression by consumers who use that content under "fair use" guidelines that are typically reviewed by a judge, he said.

While standardization and interoperability are laudable goals, the EFF is concerned that the CRF does not count any consumer advocacy groups among its members, Schultz said.

"We urge them to find a way ... to include a public or consumer voice in their efforts, because clearly it's not set up for that right now," he said.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Paul Roberts

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Tom Pope

Dynabook Portégé X30L-G

Ultimately this laptop has achieved everything I would hope for in a laptop for work, while fitting that into a form factor and weight that is remarkable.

Tom Sellers

MSI P65

This smart laptop was enjoyable to use and great to work on – creating content was super simple.

Lolita Wang

MSI GT76

It really doesn’t get more “gaming laptop” than this.

Jack Jeffries

MSI GS75

As the Maserati or BMW of laptops, it would fit perfectly in the hands of a professional needing firepower under the hood, sophistication and class on the surface, and gaming prowess (sports mode if you will) in between.

Taylor Carr

MSI PS63

The MSI PS63 is an amazing laptop and I would definitely consider buying one in the future.

Christopher Low

Brother RJ-4230B

This small mobile printer is exactly what I need for invoicing and other jobs such as sending fellow tradesman details or step-by-step instructions that I can easily print off from my phone or the Web.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?