AOL says lawsuit closes a spammer's loophole

The settlement that America Online extracted from a pair of Florida men last week may have closed a loophole used by spammers to flood e-mail in-boxes with junk mail.

On Wednesday, Dulles, Va.-based AOL announced the details of a settlement against John J. Bennett Jr., Joseph B. Elkind and their company, Netvision Audiotext Inc. in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. In the settlement, AOL dictated a list of conditions to the men, including requiring them to tell AOL of any other businesses that they might start in the future. The lawsuit, filed in January 2001, arose after AOL customers received pornographic e-mail messages from people using Bennett and Elkind's service.

"This is a tremendous victory and a landmark settlement," said AOL spokesman Nicholas Graham. "We went after a particularly egregious business model and broke it apart. This is a model that can be used by other companies as well."

Elkind and Bennett's attorney, John C. Pasierb of Arlington, Va., said his clients had no comment on the settlement.

While Green Brook, N.J.-based Junkbusters Corp. President Jason Catlett and Ari Schwartz of the Washington-based Center for Democracy and Technology both agreed that the AOL victory was interesting, they hedged on saying it was as groundbreaking as Graham said.

"This case shows that [AOL] can really take it quite far and push spammers further than they have in the past, and in that way it is a precedent," Schwartz said.

Catlett said AOL created a blueprint for how to go after a particular ruse that many spammers use. It holds companies that recruit others to do their spamming for them responsible for the havoc those spammers wreak on users' e-mail in-boxes.

According to the AOL suit, Elkind and Bennett paid a group of "webmasters" a commission for every AOL customer they attracted back to the adult Web sites the pair ran, Graham said. Each webmaster then sent out thousands of messages. Some of the webmasters set up multiple sites to launch their mass e-mail campaigns.

Technically, Elkind and Bennett didn't send the spam themselves. But the settlement holds Elkind and Bennett responsible for the spam and sets conditions the pair must abide by. Those conditions include whom Elkind and Bennett can hire, what criteria their employees must meet and the right of AOL to audit the company's records.

In addition, Graham said AOL extracted a cash settlement, but he wouldn't reveal the amount. However, in the lawsuit, which was filed in U.S. District Court in Eastern Virginia, AOL had demanded $10 per spam message. Of the 50 webmasters AOL named in its suit, most sent tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of messages. One webmaster is alleged to have sent 37.5 million messages, and another 5.3 million.

Catlett found the settlement interesting because it "attacks a nasty little tactic for promoting spam." He called it "an instructive example with some very detailed rules and the court's seal on it."

Catlett said he isn't sure if the case will provide as much firepower as AOL hopes, however, because most spammers are "fly-by-night organizations" that are hard to catch. Most of the big spammers have already been sued out of existence.

The only thing that worried Schwartz about the settlement is that other companies could use the settlement to launch an attack on the First Amendment rights of others.

"We need cases like this so that those who are abusing the public trust [are stopped]," Schwartz said. "At the same time, we have to be careful that we don't make it too difficult for legitimate people."

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Brian Sullivan

PC World
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Stocking Stuffer

SmartLens - Clip on Phone Camera Lens Set of 3

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Aysha Strobbe

Microsoft Office 365/HP Spectre x360

Microsoft Office continues to make a student’s life that little bit easier by offering reliable, easy to use, time-saving functionality, while continuing to develop new features that further enhance what is already a formidable collection of applications

Michael Hargreaves

Microsoft Office 365/Dell XPS 15 2-in-1

I’d recommend a Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 and the new Windows 10 to anyone who needs to get serious work done (before you kick back on your couch with your favourite Netflix show.)

Maryellen Rose George

Brother PT-P750W

It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!

Cathy Giles

Brother MFC-L8900CDW

The Brother MFC-L8900CDW is an absolute stand out. I struggle to fault it.

Luke Hill

MSI GT75 TITAN

I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.

Emily Tyson

MSI GE63 Raider

If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?