New Windows bug differs from 2006 flaw, Microsoft says

The bug Microsoft patched unexpectedly last week is not closely related to one the company fixed more than two years ago.

Contrary to speculation, the bug Microsoft patched unexpectedly last week is not closely related to one the company fixed more than two years ago, a company security expert said Monday.

The vulnerability in the Windows Server service that Microsoft patched with an "out-of-cycle" fix last Thursday is unrelated to another hole in the same service that the company plugged with a patch in August 2006, said Michael Howard, a principal security program manager with the company.

Howard, perhaps best known for co-authoring the book Writing Secure Code, works in the Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) group at Microsoft; SDL is also the company's name for the process it uses to generate more secure software.

"I spent a good chunk of the morning going over the analysis [of the bugs]," said Howard at mid-day Monday. "The two bugs are actually quite different. Although the effect is the same, the way you pull off an exploit is very different."

The two vulnerabilities are so different, he added, that it was no surprise that company developers didn't find the most recent one when they looked at the Windows Server service code two years ago. "[This one] is a really hard bug to spot," Howard said.

Microsoft patched the Windows Server service in August 2006's MS06-040 . Like the one posted Thursday, that bulletin calls out the remote procedure call (RPC) code in the service as the location of the bug.

To back up his claim that the newest flaw is easy to overlook, Howard cited a Twitter message three days ago from Alexander Sotirov, a noted independent security researcher. "I had the vulnerable function decompiled and fully commented back in 2006 when I was reversing MS06-040, but I just didn't see the bug," said Sotirov , who was one of a pair of researchers who helped Shane Macaulay hack Windows Vista SP1 during a March contest.

Howard acknowledged that parts of Microsoft's SDL process, specifically the fuzz tests thrown at the affected code, had failed. But he was generally upbeat about how well SDL did its job.

"At the end of the day, I'm not unhappy with how SDL performed," he said. "We have two goals. One is to reduce the number of vulnerabilities, and the second is to reduce the severity of those we miss. You're never going to get everything. Windows Vista and [Windows] Server 2008 [users] were protected; SDL reduced the seriousness of the vulnerability for them.

"So I think SDL did succeed here," Howard said.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags windows server

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Gregg Keizer

Computerworld (US)
Show Comments

Brand Post

Bitdefender 2018

Secure and Save before time runs out with Bitdefender Exclusive Clearance Offer! Get Bitdefender Total Security 2018 Now!

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Emily Tyson

MSI GE63 Raider

If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.

Laura Johnston

MSI GS65 Stealth Thin

If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?