Intel cancels 2GHz Xeon, opts for 2.2GHz

Intel Corp. has decided not to launch the expected 2GHz version of its Xeon processor for dual-processor servers this year, opting to instead launch a 2.2GHz version early in the first quarter of next year, the company said today.

Santa Clara, California-based Intel originally expected to launch the next Xeon for dual-processor servers in the fourth quarter of this year. The 2GHz processors were to be built using 0.18-micron technology, and have 256K bytes of on-die cache, Intel spokesman Otto Pipjker said. However, when Intel realized it could accelerate the delivery of the 2.2GHz Xeon, it decided to skip the 2GHz version.

"We'll deliver a triple shot of performance boosts," Pipjker said. Indeed, in addition to the 2.2GHz speed, the new dual-processor chips and chip sets, codenamed "Prestonia" and "Plumas" respectively, will features 512K bytes of on-die cache and will be manufactured using the smaller 0.13-micron process, he said.

"We decided to forgo the introduction of Foster Xeon for dual-processor servers this year because we saw it running into late (fourth quarter)," Pipjker said. "We knew Prestonia was doing well, and we didn't think it made much sense to ask our customers to validate two (processors) that quickly."

And the customers, including Compaq Computer Corp., Dell Computer Corp., IBM Corp., and Hewlett-Packard Co., agreed with Intel's decision. "The customers were all behind us," Pipjker said.

Additionally, vendors will now be shipping dual-processor Xeon systems in the first quarter of next year as well, Pipjker said.

None of Intel's other offerings will be effected by the change, Pipjker said. The Foster Xeon for workstations, which is currently available in speeds up to 1.7GHz, will continue to ship, with an additional frequency to be released this quarter, he said. The 4-way and 8-way Foster Xeons are also on track to be released in the first half of next year as well, he said.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Douglas F. Gray

Computerworld
Show Comments

Cool Tech

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

David Coyle

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?