A U.S. district court judge will extend portions of an antitrust decree governing Microsoft's actions for 18 months, the judge said Wednesday.Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia will extend portions of the decree until May 2011 at the request of the U.S. Department of Justice and states that brought the 1998 antitrust complaint against Microsoft, she told lawyers for both sides. During a hearing, Kollar-Kotelly said she will sign the request extending portions of the antitrust judgment covering technical documentation for Windows communications protocols and distribution of middleware. Microsoft did not challenge any part of the extension, although it was prohibited from fighting an extension of the technical documentation portion of the judgment when Kollar-Kotelly approved a two-year extension in 2006. While Microsoft is making progress in fixing problems with the technical documentation required in a communication protocols licensing program, the work won't be done by November, when the judgment was scheduled to expire, said Steven Houck, a lawyer representing a group of states that sued Microsoft. "The basic reason for the extension ... is that the technical documentation is still incomplete and inaccurate," Houck said. "It's clear to us that more testing was warranted before we could certify to the court that the technical documentation was reasonably complete and accurate." As of March 31, there were 1,716 identified bugs in a 30,000-page technical documentation. Microsoft closed more than 550 of those bugs by Sunday, but on Monday a court-appointed technical committee overseeing Microsoft compliance with the judgment submitted more than 350 new bugs, said Bob Muglia, president of Microsoft's server and tools division. Identified bugs may continue to rise in the immediate future, as the technical committee devotes more resources to finding them, Muglia added. Microsoft's lawyers offered little additional comment about the extension. An extension of the middleware portions of the judgment was needed to ensure that the entire judgment works together as intended, Houck added. Kollar-Kotelly agreed with the need for an extension, but said she also noted that Microsoft seems to be making progress to fix long-standing complaints about the state of the technical documentation. "I think we're finally on the right track," she said. "I think all the parties are committed to making this work." Including the 18-month extension, the Microsoft judgment will be in effect for eight and a half years. It was originally scheduled to expire in November 2007, after five years. The DOJ and state plaintiffs have authority to request an additional 18-month extension, although Houck and other plaintiff lawyers said an additional extension may not be necessary. While plaintiffs had little confidence in the schedule back in 2006, when the judgment was last extended, they now see an end to the technical documentation project, said Adam Severt, a lawyer with the DOJ. "Things are markedly different," he said. "The task Microsoft is facing is far more concrete."
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Google Pixel 2 review: not quite 'pixel perfect' but damn close
- 2 Huawei Nova 2i review: Flagship features get smuggled into the mid-tier
- 3 Moto X4 review: This is what a world without MotoMods looks like
- 4 Giabyte Aorus X9 Gaming Laptop review: Full, in-depth review
- 5 iPhone 8: Full, in-depth review
- Microsoft's Surface Book 2 has a power problem
- This week in games: Battlefront II disables microtransactions, Total War goes to Britain
- Star Wars: Battlefront II review: The Dark Side
- iMovie 10 review: Free video editing that's elegant and easy
- Buffered VPN review: It gets the job done
PCW Evaluation Team
Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.
The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.
The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.
The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic
I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.
It’s perfect for mobile workers. Just take it out — it’s small enough to sit anywhere — turn it on, load a sheet of paper, and start printing.
- Huawei Mate 10 Pro review
- Dell Inspiron 5675 Gaming Desktop review
- Legion Y520 Gaming Laptop review
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
Product Launch Showcase
- CCProject Manager - IDAMVIC
- FTTechnical Business AnalystNSW
- CCIntegration Solution ArchitectNSW
- CCKofax DeveloperVIC
- FTSAP Payroll SpecialistOther
- FTSenior Web Developer-Angular JS, CSS, GIT, JenkinsOther
- FTCyber Security Program ManagerNSW
- TPBusiness AnalystQLD
- FTSenior Business AnalystOther
- FTDigital Account StrategistSA
- FTProject ManagerACT
- TPCapacity PlannerNSW
- FTBusiness AnalystOther
- CCDBA / Database Services SME - Large Telco - Sydney CBDNSW
- FTManual Tester - Accounting & FinanceOther
- TPBusiness Continuity Senior Associate/ IT AuditNSW
- CCSystem Analyst - AxwayNSW
- FTBusiness AnalystNSW
- FTTableau DeveloperOther
- FTIT Desktop ManagerOther
- FTApplication Packaging EngineerOther
- CCSecurity/ Penetration Test AnalystQLD
- FTSenior Business ConsultantOther
- FTJunior Infrastructure EngineerACT
- FTSenior Technical ConsultantACT