IBM faces suit over Nazi-era ties

The plaintiffs, from the US, the Czech Republic, and Ukraine, claim that IBM not only profited from the use of its products in the Holocaust, but that it has refused historians and others access to archival evidence of its "complicit role in the Holocaust," the law firm Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll PLLC said in a statement. The plaintiffs are demanding that the records be made public, and that IBM "disgorge all profits made from their service to the Nazis during World War II to a Holocaust relief fund."

Lead attorney Michael Hausfeld estimated the amount IBM earned in the concentration camps "in the millions of dollars ... maybe around $US10 million" in 1940s terms. The plaintiffs are not seeking any personal compensation, he said on a conference call announcing the suit Monday.

"We have not yet seen the complaint, so we have no comment on the lawsuit," said Carol Makovich, IBM's vice president of worldwide media relations. She added, however, that IBM's archives for the period were donated to two universities in September 1999, where they are available to scholars. "I would like to make it very clear that IBM has been very open with its records," she said.

"IBM had a close contact with its German subsidiary throughout the '30s and '40s. What the lawsuit focuses on is IBM's conduct and knowledge with respect to the placement and usage of its technology and machines in concentration camps," Hausfeld said. "IBM continued to provide the machinery and know-how through at least 1943." The suit names IBM's longtime president, the late Thomas J. Watson, saying he closely oversaw IBM's German operations, and citing his "complicit participation in the [Nazi Third] Reich's agenda."

He added that while IBM headquarters severed its relationship with the German operation in mid-1943, he believes that separation was "on paper only."

Hausfeld said that IBM machines were leased, not sold, and that IBM staff paid regular service calls to program and maintain the machines installed at concentration camps. At Dachau concentration camp alone, there were 24 IBM sorters, tabulators and printers. "Do you think realistically that anyone, even if they're a technician, visiting a concentration camp on a regular basis, would not report back to someone what they're seeing?" he asked rhetorically.

The Nazi program of genocide against European Jews was public knowledge in the US by December 1942 at the latest, Hausfeld said.

The sensational lawsuit was made public at the same time as the publication of a new book, "IBM and the Holocaust," by Edwin Black, which is being released worldwide Monday. Hausfeld said the timing was not deliberate, but that after his firm learned of the publication date, they rushed preparations for the suit "so that it wouldn't get lost."

"IBM Germany, using its own staff and equipment, designed, executed, and supplied the indispensable technological assistance Hitler's Third Reich needed to accomplish what had never been done before - the automation of human destruction," said the book's publisher Little, Brown & Co. in a statement.

Makovich said that at the time the US entered World War II, in 1941, IBM owned 84 per cent of German subsidiary Deutsche Hollerith Maschinen GmbH (Dehomag for short), which sold the punchcard technology invented by the engineer Hermann Hollerith in the 1890s. "But in practice, beginning around 1933-34 ... the Nazis began to exert control over that operation, and certainly by the war years we had no effective control," she said. She stressed, however, that records for the period are incomplete, many of them having been destroyed in the war.

Dehomag became a wholly-owned subsidiary of IBM in 1947. It was renamed IBM Deutschland Internationale Büro-Maschinen GmbH in 1949, and IBM Germany in 1971.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Rick Perera

PC World
Show Comments

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?