Google wins partial victory in legal battle over trademarks

A senior judge at the European Court of Justice supports Google's search business but casts doubt over some AdWords ads

Google appeared to have won a partial victory in its long-running legal battle with trademark owners Tuesday, when a senior judge at the European Court of Justice said the company hasn't infringed anyone's trademark rights by allowing advertisers to buy search keywords corresponding to those trademarks.

Advocate general Poiares Maduro added, however, that Google may be liable for running advertisements that offer trademark-infringing products in its AdWords advertising service.

Judge Maduro was giving a non-binding legal opinion, as is customary, ahead of a ruling by the court expected early next year. In nearly all such cases the court follows the opinion of the advocate general.

At stake in the long-awaited case is Google's ad revenue-based business model and the ability of brand owners to protect their trademarks on the Internet.

Judge Maduro said that both Google's search engine and AdWords constitute information society services, which grants them an exemption to rules designed to protect companies' trademarks under the E.U.'s e-commerce directive.

To benefit from the exemption, Google must remain neutral about the information it carries, he added. And in what might turn out to be a nasty sting in the tail of the advocate general's opinion, Maduro said this might not be the case for AdWords.

"While the search engine is a neutral information vehicle applying objective criteria in order to generate the most relevant sites to the keywords entered, that is not the case with AdWords where Google has a direct pecuniary interest in Internet users clicking on the ads' links," he said, adding: "The liability exemption for hosts provided for in the E-Commerce Directive should not apply to the content featured in AdWords."

Google gave a guarded response to the opinion. "We believe that selecting a keyword to trigger the display of an ad does not amount to trademark infringement, and that consumers benefit from seeing more relevant information rather than less," said Harjinder Obhi, Google's senior litigation counsel for Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

"We also believe that consumers are smart and are not confused when they see a variety of ads displayed in response to their search queries," Obhi added.

The European Court of Justice was asked by a court in France to intervene on the trademark issue that lay at the heart of a legal battle between Google and French luxury goods maker Louis Vuitton.

Louis Vuitton complained that when entered as a search term on Google, its trademark-protected brand name would trigger ads run by rival luxury goods companies as well as for companies selling counterfeit Louis Vuitton goods.

Louis Vuitton has argued that Google's "AdWords" service, established in the U.S. and now extended to Europe, allows advertisers to bid on terms like "Louis Vuitton fakes", and that the right to offer a trademarked name as part of a search advertising program breaches E.U. rules.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags advertisingeuropeadwordsGooglelegallawsuitstrademarks

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Paul Meller

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

David Coyle

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?